subject:"BUS\: RE\: Test message"

Re: BUS: RE: Test message

2008-06-16 Thread Benjamin Schultz

On Jun 15, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: ais523 wrote: I initiate a criminal CFJ against OscarMeyr for violating rule 2149 by claiming there was "nothing to see here" when in fact there was. Arguments: The fact that the message was replied to (by more than one person, in fact!) implies

Re: BUS: RE: Test message

2008-06-15 Thread Ed Murphy

ais523 wrote: > I initiate a criminal CFJ against OscarMeyr for violating rule > 2149 by claiming there was "nothing to see here" when in fact > there was. > > Arguments: > The fact that the message was replied to (by more than one > person, in fact!) implies that there was something to see > the

BUS: RE: Test message

2008-06-15 Thread Alexander Smith

I initiate a criminal CFJ against OscarMeyr for violating rule 2149 by claiming there was "nothing to see here" when in fact there was. Arguments: The fact that the message was replied to (by more than one person, in fact!) implies that there was something to see there. Evidence: OscarMeyr wrote: