I retract "Community Chest Repeal" and create and pend with shinies the
below.
Title: Community Chest Repeal II
AI: 2
Text: Repeal rule 2508, "Community Chest"
Amend rules 2510 "Such is Karma" and 2511 "Karmic Balance" in numerical
order by
replacing any instances of the phrases "the Community Chest" and "The
Community Chest" with the word "Agora".
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:31 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, only to a-d.
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:25 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Pretty sure I retracted that version of Community Chest Repeal and
>> replaced it with a version that amended the two rules in sequential order.
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Aris Merchant <
>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have trouble believing that this is it, but these are all the
>>> proposals I could find.
>>>
>>> -Aris
>>> ---
>>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
>>> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
>>> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
>>> quorum is 6.0 and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is
>>> also a valid vote, as are valid conditional votes).
>>>
>>> ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend
>>> fee
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ---------------
>>> 7957* G. 1.0 Random Irony G. OP
>>> [1]
>>> 7958* G. 2.0 Succession Planning G. OP
>>> [1]
>>> 7959* Telnaior 3.0 Deregistration Fix Telnaior 1 AP
>>> 7960* V.J. Rada 2.0 Community Chest Repeal V.J. Rada 2 sh.
>>> 7961* G. 1.0 Fear less G. 1 AP
>>>
>>>
>>> The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals:
>>>
>>> ID Author(s) AI Title
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ---------------
>>> pp1 Alexis 1.7 A Most Ingenious Paradox
>>>
>>> Legend: <ID>* : Proposal is pending.
>>>
>>> [1] Official Proposal, inherently pending
>>>
>>>
>>> A proposal may be pended for 1 AP, or for 1/20th the Floating Value
>>> in shines (see the Treasuror's report).
>>>
>>> The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below.
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: 7957
>>> Title: Random Irony
>>> Adoption index: 1.0
>>> Author: G.
>>> Co-authors:
>>> OFFICIAL PROPOSAL
>>>
>>>
>>> Repeal Rule 2505 (Random Choices).
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: 7958
>>> Title: Succession Planning
>>> Adoption index: 2.0
>>> Author: G.
>>> Co-authors:
>>> OFFICIAL PROPOSAL
>>>
>>>
>>> Amend Rule 1006 (Offices) by replacing:
>>>
>>> The holder of an elected office CAN resign it by announcement, causing
>>> it to become vacant.
>>>
>>> with:
>>>
>>> The holder of an elected office CAN resign it by announcement, causing
>>> it to become vacant. The non-interim holder of an elected office CAN,
>>> With 3 Support, resign the office while appointing another player to
>>> become the holder of the office, provided that other player is one of
>>> the Supporters.
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: 7959
>>> Title: Deregistration Fix
>>> Adoption index: 3.0
>>> Author: Telnaior
>>> Co-authors:
>>>
>>>
>>> Amend Rule 869 ("How to Join and Leave Agora", power 3) as follows:
>>> Modify the string "If a player has not sent a message to a public
>>> forum in the
>>> last month, then any player CAN deregister em without objection."
>>> to
>>> "If a player has not sent a message to a public forum in the last
>>> month,
>>> then any player CAN deregister em with 3 Agoran Consent."
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: 7960
>>> Title: Community Chest Repeal
>>> Adoption index: 2.0
>>> Author: V.J. Rada
>>> Co-authors:
>>>
>>>
>>> Repeal rule 2508, "Community Chest"
>>> Amend rules 2510 "Such is Karma" and 2511 "Karmic Balance" by
>>> replacing any instances of the phrases "the Community Chest" and "The
>>> Community Chest" with the word "Agora".
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: 7961
>>> Title: Fear less
>>> Adoption index: 1.0
>>> Author: G.
>>> Co-authors:
>>>
>>>
>>> Repeal Rule 2309 (The Propose-O-Matic).
>>>
>>> [It's a bit of a fun thing when the game is slow, but otherwise just
>>> adds some noise, and plenty of us are looking at the past for things
>>> to re-enact without it].
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: pp1
>>> Title: A Most Ingenious Paradox
>>> Adoption index: 1.7
>>> Author: Alexis
>>> Co-authors:
>>>
>>>
>>> Text in square brackets is not a part of this proposal and has no
>>> effect.
>>>
>>> Enact a new power-1 rule entitled "Win by Paradox":
>>>
>>> If a CFJ has been assigned a judgment of PARADOXICAL continuously
>>> for at least 7 days, and e has not done so already in respect of
>>> that CFJ, then that case's initiator CAN, by announcement, win the
>>> game.
>>>
>>> A player who wins in this fashion SHOULD submit a proposal to
>>> prevent the paradox from arising again.
>>>
>>> Amend rule 591 by replacing:
>>>
>>> The valid judgements for an inquiry case are as follows, based on
>>> the truth or falsity of the statement at the time the inquiry case
>>> was initiated (if its truth value changed at that time, then its
>>> initial truth value is used):
>>>
>>> with:
>>>
>>> The valid judgements for an inquiry case are as follows, based on
>>> the facts and legal situation at the time the inquiry case was
>>> initiated, not taking into account any events since that time:
>>>
>>> [This is to prevent changing facts not related to truth or falsity, e.g.
>>> availability of information, from affecting outcomes.]
>>>
>>> and by replacing:
>>>
>>> * DISMISS, appropriate if the statement is malformed, undecidable,
>>> if insufficient information exists to make a judgement with
>>> reasonable effort, or the statement is otherwise not able to be
>>> answered with another valid judgement.
>>>
>>> with:
>>>
>>> * DISMISS, appropriate if the statement is malformed, undecidable,
>>> if insufficient information exists to make a judgement with
>>> reasonable effort, or the statement is otherwise not able to be
>>> answered with another valid judgement. DISMISS is not
>>> appropriate if PARADOXICAL is appropriate.
>>>
>>> and by appending to the end:
>>>
>>> * PARADOXICAL, appropriate if the statement is logically
>>> undecidable as a result of a paradox or or other irresovable
>>> logical situation. PARADOXICAL is not appropriate if IRRELEVANT
>>> is appropriate, nor is it appropriate if the undecidability
>>> arises from the case itself.
>>>
>>> [The reference to IRRELEVANT is to prevent multiple wins from the same
>>> paradox.]
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> From V.J. Rada
>>
>
>
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>
--
>From V.J. Rada
