On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement.
I support and appeal CFJ2610.
I believe there's serious doubt about the incorrect information
becoming platonically true, plus see my recent CFJ about the validity
of the decision in the first
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> allispaul wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2610
>>>
>>> == CFJ 2610 ==
>>>
>>> The PerlNomic Pa
allispaul wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2610
>>
>> == CFJ 2610 ==
>>
>>The PerlNomic Partnership was an eligible voter in the recent
>>Grand P
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2610
>
> == CFJ 2610 ==
>
> The PerlNomic Partnership was an eligible voter in the recent
> Grand Poobah election.
>
> ==
