On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Ed Murphy<emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2644 > > ============================== CFJ 2644 ============================== > > The owner of a Local Election card CAN play it, causing it to be > destroyed. > > ========================================================================
I judge FALSE. While I am leaning towards G.'s arguments that R2256 contains an implicit claim of precedence, even without this claim R217 leads me towards this judgment. Common sense and the best interests of the game both indicate that Local Election cards could not be played when the CFJ was called. -- C-walker (Charles Walker)
