On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I support, and ask that the judge explicitly address whether a report
> with multiple parts constitutes multiple duties, specifically in
> comparison with non-report duties currently defined by the rules
> and possible combinations of such duties.
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 16:17, comex wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2655
>>>
>>> == CFJ 2655 ==
>>>
>>>I am owed a draw from the
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 16:17, comex wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2655
>>
>> == CFJ 2655 ==
>>
>> I am owed a draw from the Government deck.
>>
>>
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2655
>
> == CFJ 2655 ==
>
> I am owed a draw from the Government deck.
>
> =
