On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Goethe wrote:
>
>> CFJ 2151:
A moment ago, I revealed that my age is a composite number by
announcement.
>>
>> TRUE
>
> I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. I ask that the
> caller reveal whether
Goethe wrote:
> CFJ 2151:
>>>A moment ago, I revealed that my age is a composite number by
>>>announcement.
>
> TRUE
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. I ask that the
caller reveal whether e was lying about eir age, and that the judge
explain how such lying would affect
I deliver the following judgements:
>> == CFJ 2149 ==
>>A moment ago, I celebrated by announcement.
According to the top-ranked search results, *this* is to celebrate:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwEMxYggoKQ
The dictionary definit
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 09:25 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> This is ridiculous, to have no referent email to "a moment ago".
> Don't know if it's a Caller or a CotC slip though.
> It is beyond a reasonable effort of a judge to find it given the
> current traffic. I offer the caller a couple days to
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> == CFJ 2149 ==
>
>A moment ago, I celebrated by announcement.
>
>
> == CFJ 2151
