I judge CFJs 3262, 3263, and 3264 FALSE, TRUE, and TRUE, respectively. The email's headers indicate that it should be interpreted as UTF-8, and when it is so interpreted the Foo comes before the Bar.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3262 > > ============================== CFJ 3262 ============================== > > I have already called a CFJ in this message. (Foo) > > ======================================================================== > > Caller: Machiavelli > > Judge: FKA441344 > Judgement: > > ======================================================================== > > History: > > Called by Machiavelli: 30 Aug 2012 00:20:40 GMT > Assigned to ais523: 30 Aug 2012 19:23:41 GMT > ais523 recused: 08 Sep 2012 21:00:06 GMT > Assigned to FKA441344: (as of this message) > > ======================================================================== > > Caller's Evidence: > > [CotC: The initiating message specified UTF-8. E280AE is Unicode > RIGHT-TO-LEFT OVERRIDE, E280AC is POP DIRECTIONAL FORMATTING. The > numbering of these CFJs does not necessarily match the order in which > they were created.] > > Define the word "=E2=80=AEooF=E2=80=AC" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the > statement "I > have already called a CFJ in this message. (Foo)".}, and define the > word "=E2=80=AEraB=E2=80=AC" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I > have already > called a CFJ in this message. (Bar)".}. > > =E2=80=AEraB ooF > > The answers are obvious, right? The first one is FALSE, and the second > one is TRUE. > > Oh, and for good measure, I call a CFJ on the statement "I have > already called a CFJ in this message. (Plaz)". > > > ======================================================================== > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3263 > > ============================== CFJ 3263 ============================== > > I have already called a CFJ in this message. (Bar) > > ======================================================================== > > Caller: Machiavelli > > Judge: FKA441344 > Judgement: > > ======================================================================== > > History: > > Called by Machiavelli: 30 Aug 2012 00:20:40 GMT > Assigned to ais523: 30 Aug 2012 19:23:41 GMT > ais523 recused: 08 Sep 2012 21:00:06 GMT > Assigned to FKA441344: (as of this message) > > ======================================================================== > > Caller's Evidence: > > [CotC: The initiating message specified UTF-8. E280AE is Unicode > RIGHT-TO-LEFT OVERRIDE, E280AC is POP DIRECTIONAL FORMATTING. The > numbering of these CFJs does not necessarily match the order in which > they were created.] > > Define the word "=E2=80=AEooF=E2=80=AC" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the > statement "I > have already called a CFJ in this message. (Foo)".}, and define the > word "=E2=80=AEraB=E2=80=AC" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I > have already > called a CFJ in this message. (Bar)".}. > > =E2=80=AEraB ooF > > The answers are obvious, right? The first one is FALSE, and the second > one is TRUE. > > Oh, and for good measure, I call a CFJ on the statement "I have > already called a CFJ in this message. (Plaz)". > > > ======================================================================== > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3264 > > ============================== CFJ 3264 ============================== > > I have already called a CFJ in this message. (Plaz) > > ======================================================================== > > Caller: Machiavelli > > Judge: FKA441344 > Judgement: > > ======================================================================== > > History: > > Called by Machiavelli: 30 Aug 2012 00:20:40 GMT > Assigned to ais523: 30 Aug 2012 19:23:41 GMT > ais523 recused: 08 Sep 2012 21:00:06 GMT > Assigned to FKA441344: (as of this message) > > ======================================================================== > > Caller's Evidence: > > [CotC: The initiating message specified UTF-8. E280AE is Unicode > RIGHT-TO-LEFT OVERRIDE, E280AC is POP DIRECTIONAL FORMATTING. The > numbering of these CFJs does not necessarily match the order in which > they were created.] > > Define the word "=E2=80=AEooF=E2=80=AC" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the > statement "I > have already called a CFJ in this message. (Foo)".}, and define the > word "=E2=80=AEraB=E2=80=AC" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I > have already > called a CFJ in this message. (Bar)".}. > > =E2=80=AEraB ooF > > The answers are obvious, right? The first one is FALSE, and the second > one is TRUE. > > Oh, and for good measure, I call a CFJ on the statement "I have > already called a CFJ in this message. (Plaz)". > > > ========================================================================
