On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 8:12 PM Rebecca via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I intend to destroy the following pledges without objection
> Grok's gratuitous (arguments were submitted and he already gave the cash,
> also there's no such thing as a shiny)
>
I object to this o
I pay 5 coins (my Officer salary) to Falsifian
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 3:01 PM Rebecca wrote:
> COE I forgot to include the contract "needlessly abstract exchange". I
> also forgot to include G's shinies contract. I accept the CoE and publish
> the below report valid as of now.
>
> I also publish
I intend to destroy the following pledges without objection
Grok's gratuitous (arguments were submitted and he already gave the cash,
also there's no such thing as a shiny)
Rousseau was better (the proposal referred to was withdrawn)
Trigon is a show-off (punishment was levied here)
On Wed, Jun 3
Coe: the text of Rousseau was better is wrong
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:06 PM Rebecca via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> This is the notary's weekly report (the last one before I lose the
> position, sad)
>
> There are 3 contracts
>
> === CONTR
CoE: Since you sent your DRGN message to a discussion forum and I attempted
to pf it, your attempt at joining the contract was ineffective, and
your attempt at buying shares may have been effective, depending on whether
my pf attempt failed completely or partially.
I recommend joining the
Jason wrote:
On 2/9/20 1:48 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
If Notary does not have Ministry set, then I set it to {Economy}.
I believe you can only do this without objection, per Proposal 8291's
rule "ministries".
Right you are, expunged that from the database as well.
I inte
twg wrote:
Gaelan wrote:
NOTARY'S REPORT OF JANUARY 29 2020
Ooh, just occurred to me you don't have a Ministry set! That probably
wants doing. I reckon Economy probably fits best, since the Ministries
rule specifically calls out contracts ("private enterprise") as falling
under Economy.
Only
Gaelan wrote:
> PLEDGE
> |Jason Promises to Reassess Jason|
> |MADE: Jan 30 2020 13:33|WINDOW: 7dy|EXPIRES: Feb 06 2020 13:33|N: 2|
> ==
Accepted. The NOTARY expresses frustration that eir text editor blatantly
ignored the fact that clearly e had MEANT to save that file, even if e didn’t
say so.
Gaelan
> On Feb 8, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> On 2/8/20 8:26 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-official
On 2/8/20 8:26 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-official wrote:
> PLEDGE
> |Jason Promises to Reassess Jason|
> |MADE: Jan 30 2020 13:33|WINDOW: 7dy|EXPIRES: Feb 06 2020 13:33|N: 2|
> ===
I wrote:
> Gaelan wrote:
> > NOTARY'S REPORT OF JANUARY 29 2020
>
> Ooh, just occurred to me you don't have a Ministry set! That probably
> wants doing. I reckon Economy probably fits best, since the Ministries
> rule specifically calls out contracts ("private enterprise") as falling
> under Econom
Gaelan wrote:
> NOTARY'S REPORT OF JANUARY 29 2020
Ooh, just occurred to me you don't have a Ministry set! That probably
wants doing. I reckon Economy probably fits best, since the Ministries
rule specifically calls out contracts ("private enterprise") as falling
under Economy.
Only the ADoP can
CoE: It looks like you accidentally copied something from another
contract onto the bottom of OotOH.
On 4/25/2018 7:12 AM, Ned Strange wrote:
The following Contracts exist. Each Contract except the first was
created since the last report. Many Contracts were also destroyed.
--- Order of the Oc
I cause the following contracts to transfer 1 sh. apiece to Agora to pay their
monthly sustenance:
* 狐票店
* MiniNomic
* The Agoran Credit Union
I intend, with notice, to destroy the following contracts, which were unable to
pay their sustenance payments:
* No Self-Indulgence
* Reporting Agency
> On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:29 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:26 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>>
>> This is my 48 hours notice. I intend to remove all parts of isnack2.0
>> except the third paragaph, then add the text "this contract has no
>> effect".
>>
>> (o, you should destroy is
Ah, nevermind.
I doubt it did, but just in case that made the whole message fail, I support.
On 11/21/2017 6:02 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
Agoran consent, not two support.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:57 AM, ATMunn wrote:
I support and do so.
On 11/21/2017 3:11 PM, Corona wrote:
I support
On 11/20/
I support and do so.
On 11/21/2017 3:11 PM, Corona wrote:
I support
On 11/20/17, Aris Merchant wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:29 PM Owen Jacobson wrote:
On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:26 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
This is my 48 hours notice. I intend to remove all parts of isnack2.0
except the third
I support
On 11/20/17, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:29 PM Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:26 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>> >
>> > This is my 48 hours notice. I intend to remove all parts of isnack2.0
>> > except the third paragaph, then add the text "this contr
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:29 PM Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:26 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> >
> > This is my 48 hours notice. I intend to remove all parts of isnack2.0
> > except the third paragaph, then add the text "this contract has no
> > effect".
> >
> > (o, you should destroy
> On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:26 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> This is my 48 hours notice. I intend to remove all parts of isnack2.0
> except the third paragaph, then add the text "this contract has no
> effect".
>
> (o, you should destroy isnack2.0. only the notary can do so w/ agoran
> consent i believe,
This is my 48 hours notice. I intend to remove all parts of isnack2.0
except the third paragaph, then add the text "this contract has no
effect".
(o, you should destroy isnack2.0. only the notary can do so w/ agoran
consent i believe, although anyone can w/out objection)
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5
" For one week after this contract's inception, players should come up with
sequel jokes stupider than the current title. Whoever comes up with the
stupidest sequel joke, as judged by V.J. Rada, SHALL be transferred 5
shinies from V.J. Rada. The title of the contract shall be amended b
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Murphy | 2010-01-31 21:33:55-08 | 1
Oh you've still got one? I expunge this by paying a fee. -G.
ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 22:05 -0500, comex wrote:
>> RESTS
>>
>> NameRests Notes
>> ---
>> ehird 1
>
> As a fee-based action costing 2 ergs, I revoke a Rest from ehird.
CoE on the Herald's weekly report posted
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 22:05 -0500, comex wrote:
> RESTS
>
> NameRests Notes
> ---
> ehird 1
As a fee-based action costing 2 ergs, I revoke a Rest from ehird.
--
ais523
25 matches
Mail list logo