On 11/14/2011 12:37 AM, omd wrote:
>> 7142 1.0 tswett Software Transactional Memory
> AGAINST - I think "fails to take effect" is a little ambiguous,
> "perform a sequence of events" is ungrammatical, and the rule arguably
> fails to work correctly due to insufficient power
I change my vote t
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> 7136 1.0 scshunt What?
PRESENT
> 7137 3.0 omd. okay, this has gotten silly
FOR
> 7138 1.0 omd. Whereto Paradox?
FOR
> 7139 1.7 omd. This is still an issue
FOR
> 7140 1.7 G. re-paradox
AGAINST
> 7141 2.0 G.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 19:13, Tanner Swett wrote:
> CoE: the author of Proposals 7142-3 is the Promotor.
Denied.
-scshunt
CoE: the author of Proposals 7142-3 is the Promotor.
I vote:
> 7136 1.0 scshunt What?
FOR
> 7137 3.0 omd. okay, this has gotten silly
PRESENT
> 7138 1.0 omd. Whereto Paradox?
PRESENT
> 7139 1.7 omd. This is still an issue
FOR
> 7140 1.7 G. re-paradox
PRESENT
> 7136 1.0 scshunt What?
FOR
> 7137 3.0 omd.okay, this has gotten silly
FOR
> 7138 1.0 omd.Whereto Paradox?
FOR
> 7139 1.7 omd.This is still an issue
FOR
> 7140 1.7 G. re-paradox
FOR
> 7141 2.0 G. master switcher
FOR
> 7142 1.0 tswett Software Tran
NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE
7136 1.0 scshunt What?
FOR
7137 3.0 omd.okay, this has gotten silly
AGAINST
7138 1.0 omd.Whereto Paradox?
FOR
7139 1.7 omd.This is still an issue
FOR
7140 1.7 G. re-paradox
PRESENT
7141 2.0 G. master switcher
AGAINST
7142 1.0
> 7136 1.0 scshunt What?
AGAINST
> 7137 3.0 omd.okay, this has gotten silly
AGAINST
> 7138 1.0 omd.Whereto Paradox?
FOR
> 7139 1.7 omd.This is still an issue
FOR
> 7140 1.7 G. re-paradox
FOR
> 7141 2.0 G. master switcher
FOR
> 7142 1.0 tswett Softw
