I vote as follows:
On 6/30/13 15:19 , omd wrote:
> NUM AI PF C I AUTHOR TITLE
>
> 7482 10 O D Murphy Lateral transfer
AGAINST
> 7483 1 20 O scshunt Scoping It Out
AGAINST
> 7484 1 20 O Roujo Scoping It All
AGAINST
> 7485 2 40 O omd Such an ugly word
E
7482 10 O D Murphy Lateral transfer
FOR
7483 1 20 O scshunt Scoping It Out
FOR
7484 1 20 O Roujo Scoping It All
AGAINST (already true by lack of ambiguity)
7485 2 40 O omd Such an ugly word
FOR
7486 20 O D scshunt Clearing Up
FOR
7487 3 10
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:42 AM, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 6:28 PM, omd wrote:
>>> 7498 10 O D omd one Renaissance is enough
>> PRESENT
>
> I change my vote to FOR.
>
As do I. I may change if a sufficient reform proposal is made.
-scshunt
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 6:28 PM, omd wrote:
>> 7498 10 O D omd one Renaissance is enough
> PRESENT
I change my vote to FOR.
On 30 June 2013 23:19, omd wrote:
> 7482 10 O D Murphy Lateral transfer
FOR
> 7483 1 20 O scshunt Scoping It Out
AGAINST
> 7484 1 20 O Roujo Scoping It All
AGAINST
> 7485 2 40 O omd Such an ugly word
FOR
> 7486 20 O D scshunt Clearing Up
FOR
> 7487 3
On 30/06/2013 6:19 PM, omd wrote:
7482 10 O D Murphy Lateral transfer
PRESENT
7483 1 20 O scshunt Scoping It Out
PRESENT
7484 1 20 O Roujo Scoping It All
PRESENT
7485 2 40 O omd Such an ugly word
AGAINST
7486 20 O D scshunt Clearing Up
FOR
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 6:19 PM, omd wrote:
> 7490 1 25 S scshunt Funcentives
UNSUPPORTEDNESS
> 7491 25 S scshunt Yakity
CAMBIAL
-scshunt
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 6:19 PM, omd wrote:
> 7482 10 O D Murphy Lateral transfer
AGAINST as this is not a disinterested proposal.
> 7483 1 20 O scshunt Scoping It Out
FOR
> 7484 1 20 O Roujo Scoping It All
AGAINST
> 7485 2 40 O omd Such an ugly word
PRESENT
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 6:19 PM, omd wrote:
> 7482 10 O D Murphy Lateral transfer
AGAINST
> 7483 1 20 O scshunt Scoping It Out
AGAINST
> 7484 1 20 O Roujo Scoping It All
AGAINST
> 7485 2 40 O omd Such an ugly word
FOR
> 7486 20 O D scshunt Clearing Up
