I push the boulder
——
Ben
I award the Speaker a Platinum Ribbon.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, September 28, 2018 10:39 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey
wrote:
> The contract referred to in the quoted message has text as follows:
>
> {This document is a contract between Aris and twg. No other player can become
The contract referred to in the quoted message has text as follows:
{This document is a contract between Aris and twg. No other player can become a
party to this contract, and neither Aris nor twg can cease to be a party to
this contract except when this contract terminates.
For the period of 1
Oh, and in case anyone was concerned, this contract in no way obliges Aris to
find or not to find any particular judgement on the CFJ about my and D.
Margaux's possible win, or indeed to make that win's validity more or less
probable in any other way.
Sending this to the public forum so that it
I consent to the
438157C12DCFFF13702604EC6EDE96F8B8078184E2F10996B08B3025B0B71A3C14275A3C12AE1C695054EF226EA0F471FF55537895094B0B4932F46493261645
document.
-Aris
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 1:16 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I have sent a document to Aris with the SHA-512 hash
> 438157C12DCFFF13702
I have sent a document to Aris with the SHA-512 hash
438157C12DCFFF13702604EC6EDE96F8B8078184E2F10996B08B3025B0B71A3C14275A3C12AE1C695054EF226EA0F471FF55537895094B0B4932F46493261645.
I consent to be bound by the terms of that document, with the intent for it to
become a contract if and when Aris
I have sent a document to Aris with the SHA-512 hash
C3405858BDCB0741C2A38E6EAA04871E18B94A192EBCB6707BC82865488F89B7ED467207940691A093A0F933012D4C7FBE0A542F884477685A75814C7C544EEC.
I consent to be bound by the terms of that document, with the intent for it to
become a contract if and when Aris
In anticipation of my treasuror report, I act on behalf of Quazie to:
-destroy one of Quazie's apples to move Quazie to (1,-1)
-transfer all assets from the farm at (1,-1) to Quazie
-transfer all of Quazie's liquid assets to me
~Corona
On 31/07/2013 3:49 PM, John Smith wrote:
Fails because you aren't authorized to act on behalf of Davy 1. Saying 'Person
X told me to act on their behalf' isn't considered sufficient around here.
That's not the requirement, it is:
states that he does so in the name of Davy I...
And I di
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 12:49 -0700, John Smith wrote:
> > Fails because you aren't authorized to act on behalf of Davy 1.
> > Saying 'Person X told me to act on their behalf' isn't considered
> > sufficient around here.
>
> I also have a stro
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 12:49 -0700, John Smith wrote:
> Fails because you aren't authorized to act on behalf of Davy 1.
> Saying 'Person X told me to act on their behalf' isn't considered
> sufficient around here.
I also have a strong suspicion that Davy I is not a person, and thus
generally inca
July 29, 2013 4:46 PM
> Subject: BUS: Stuff
>
> In the name of Davy I, Queen of Agora Nomic, CAT 24, and her other
> realms, I cause the new rule created by proposal 7537 to amend itself to
> read:
> {{
>
> Notwithstanding rule 2350, any first-class person can a
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Fool wrote:
> In the name of Davy I, Queen of Agora Nomic, CAT 24, and her other realms,
> I cause the new rule created by proposal 7537 to amend itself to read:
> {{
>
> Notwithstanding rule 2350, any first-class person can also create a
> proposal by announceme
In the name of Davy I, Queen of Agora Nomic, CAT 24, and her other
realms, I cause the new rule created by proposal 7537 to amend itself to
read:
{{
Notwithstanding rule 2350, any first-class person can also create a
proposal by announcement, specifying the attributes as described in that
ru
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> CFJ, disqualifying scshunt: A Rule titled "The Dictionary" exists.
I disfavor this case.
And again:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> insofar as they may lead to the formation game custom.
Perhaps we should, at some
Machiavelli wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to add the following definitions to the Dictionary:
{
"rabble": "All words following the word 'rabble' in this message are
to be interpreted without regard to their definition in the
Dictionary, except insofar as this message explicitly indicates
I intend, with 2 support, to add the following definitions to the Dictionary:
{
"rabble": "All words following the word 'rabble' in this message are
to be interpreted without regard to their definition in the
Dictionary, except insofar as this message explicitly indicates
otherwise.",
"repeal"
I assume Lexicographor. I publish the Dictionary: {}
-scshunt
I go on hold.
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> The only meaningful interpretation of an "increase in voting limit" here
> is something that causes the voting limit to be higher than it would
> otherwise be; applying an increase in voting limit to a player means
> they have more votes than their caste wo
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 16:50 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Caller's arguments:
>
> Rule 2156 purports to define an eligible voter's voting limit, not
> merely eir initial or base voting limit. Thus, after Rule 2126
> increased ehird's voting limit, Rule 2156 reasserted itself and
> reset it to eir cas
comex wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Surely these are ineffective because they don't have those notes?
>
> They (in theory) gained them at the end of the week (i.e. 00:00) due
> to the spam proposals passing. This was, of course, the purpose of
2008/11/17 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Aha. I initiate an inquiry case on the following statement,
> disqualifying comex:
>
> Neither Proposal 5956 nor Proposal 5962 has been adopted.
Arguments:
Strong precedent is that one-off increases work.
I CFJ on the statement:
{
ehird is a Walrus.
}
On behalf of P1: P1 spends one F# note to increase ehird's voting
limit on Proposal 5962 by 1.
On behalf of P2: P2 spends one F# note to increase ehird's voting
limit on Proposal 5962 by 1.
On behalf of P3: P3 spends one F# note to increase ehird's vo
I vote FOR proposal 5546.
I join the Vote Market.
I post a Sell Ticket with a cost of AUCTION and the following action:
{
Mill (/) two crops transfered to me by the filler in the order
specified by the filler, and transfer the result to the filler.
}
I join the PRS.
Pavitra
25 matches
Mail list logo
