I vote as follows:
Prime Minister - [Janet, 4st, snail, ais523]
Referee - [ais523, juan]
I vote:
FOR proposal 8851.
FOR proposal 8852.
FOR proposal 8853.
AGAINST proposal 8855.
I am not voting on proposals 8854 or 8856 as I am new and do not feel
like I can make an informed decision on these two proposals as of now.
I transfer one victory card to Trigon.
I transfer one vp to Trigon.
-Cuddlybanana
I vote FOR Proposal 8164, referring to the Decision to adopt Proposal
8164 with a voting period that is currently ongoing.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:33 AM Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> In all Agoran decisions regarding the adoption of 8164, I vote FOR. G may act
> on my behalf to vote FOR in Agoran decisions on which I have not yet voted;
> this permission is revocable at any time.
>
First use of this offer (if any) wil
I vote and cause L to vote FOR proposal 8164
> On Mar 8, 2019, at 10:59 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Right then.
>
> I vote FOR Proposal 8164 (referring to the Decision to adopt this proposal
> with the voting period that is currently ongoing).
> On behalf of Halian, I likewise vote FOR Propos
In all Agoran decisions regarding the adoption of 8164, I vote FOR. G may act
on my behalf to vote FOR in Agoran decisions on which I have not yet voted;
this permission is revocable at any time.
Gaelan
> On Mar 8, 2019, at 7:59 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Right then.
>
> I vote FOR Propo
Right then.
I vote FOR Proposal 8164 (referring to the Decision to adopt this proposal
with the voting period that is currently ongoing).
On behalf of Halian, I likewise vote FOR Proposal 8164.
On behalf of Halian I do:
Notice of Honour
+1 twg (for providing a thorough timeline analysis of a c
On the below proposals, I cause L to ENDORSE me and I vote as follows:
> Proposal ID: 8164
> Title: Correction to Agoran Satisfaction, Version 2.4
> Author: Falsifian
> Co-authors: ais523, D. Margaux, G., twg
> Adoption Index: 3.1
FOR
> 8165 D Margaux, Gaelan 3.0 Dependent Action Cleanup A
I vote as follows:
8152 FOR
8153 FOR (inadvertent mistakes can be papered over by auto-ratification)
8154 AGAINT
8155 PRESENT
8156 FOR
8157 FOR
8158 AGAINST (if it somehow exists after all)
8159 FOR
8160 FOR
8161 FOR
8162 FOR
8163 FOR
I vote FOR 8008 and FOR 8009.
I vote FOR all Agoran Decisions to adopt proposals that are
currently in their voting periods.
I cause 天火狐 using eir latest agency which I believe is 狐票店 but I make
no promises, to vote in the ADoP and PM elections in this way ""I
endorse the entity who has, between the period of the posting of this
message and the tallying of the vote, transferred strictly the most
value in Assets (assessed
Oh right the office is spelled "Reportor" silly autocorrect
I vote myself for Reportor.
天火狐
On 6 September 2017 at 16:59, Josh T wrote:
> I vote myself for Reporter.
>
> For all other elections, I would like to remind everyone else of my newest
> agency.
>
> 天火狐
>
I vote myself for Reporter.
For all other elections, I would like to remind everyone else of my newest
agency.
天火狐
Additionally on
7863* Quazie1.2 Why should outsiders...
I VOTE PRESENT
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:04 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
> 7958* Aris, [1] 3.0 Assets v7
> I VOTE FOR
> 7859* Quazie, grok 1.7 Gentle Judicial Updates
> I VOTE FOR
> 7860* Quazie1.7 Cards are power 1.7
>
7958* Aris, [1] 3.0 Assets v7
I VOTE FOR
7859* Quazie, grok 1.7 Gentle Judicial Updates
I VOTE FOR
7860* Quazie1.7 Cards are power 1.7
I VOTE PRESENT
7861* Quazie, [2] 3.0 Trivia(l)
Believing that the triviality of proposals should remain vague, I VOTE FOR
7862* Quazie, [3]
In all agoran decisions currently up for vote:
If that decision is about a proposal written by ais523:
I endorse ais523 on that agoran decision.
I vote as follows:
7698 1 ais523 Ribbons 2014
AGAINST
7699 3 scshunt Immutability
FOR
7700 1 Henri Office Salary
FOR
7701 2 Henri Credits
FOR
7702 1 Henri Minister for Social Stratification
FOR
7703 1 G. hard reset
AGAINST
7704 1 G.
I cast the following votes in the elections, in order of appearance:
scshunt, ais523, omd, G.
-Tiger
I vote FOR on each proposal on which I have not already voted.
--
ais523
I vote as follows
7601
--
Ben Schultz
I vote as follows:
7601 - PRESENT
7602 - AGAINST
7603 - AGAINST
7604 - If there is a rulekeepor, ENDORSE RULEKEEPOR. Otherwise, FOR.
7605 - PRESENT
7606 - FOR
7607 - FOR
7608 - AGAINST
7609 - AGAINST
--
Bayushi
I cast my vote for Proposals 7595, 7600:
PRESENT 7595
PRESENT 7600
-Henri
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 10:39 -0400, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> I vote PRESENT on every proposal I haven't voted on yet, but CAN vote on.
On proposals on which I have not yet voted, I vote AGAINST on every
proposal with an AI no greater than 1.5, and PRESENT on all other
proposals.
--
ais523
I vote PRESENT on every proposal I haven't voted on yet, but CAN vote on.
~ Roujo
I spend 2 VCs to increase my VVLOP by 1.
I spend 2 VCs to increase my VVLOP by 1.
I spend 2 VCs to increase my VVLOP by 1.
I spend 2 VCs to increase my VVLOP by 1.
I spend 2 VCs to increase my VVLOP by 1.
I spend 2 VCs to increase my VVLOP by 1.
(It's not clear how many, exactly, succeed, but it's
I spend 3 VCs to increase Machiavelli's VVLOP by 2 and Lindar's by 1.
7526 20 O woggle Yak Cleanup Grammar Fixes
FOR
7527 10 O Murphy Within measurable distance of its end
FOR
7528 2 50 O omd Voting auctions
AGAINST
7529 20 O omd The Wisconsin Line-I
I vote ENDORSE G. in all Agoran Decisions currently in their voting periods
(yes, even the non-proposal ones).
-scshunt
FOR all proposals in their voting period.
I vote AGAINST all decisions to adopt proposals currently
in their voting period. -G.
I spend 6 VCs to increase my VVLOP by 3.
I vote:
> 7453 2 0 O scshunt Criminal Accountability
1xAGAINST, 1000xFOR
> 7454 2 0 O WalkerContract law
1000xAGAINST (wholly insufficient in context)
> 7455 3 0 O omd We don't need judicial declarations
1xAGAINST, 1
I cast one vote AGAINST, and the remainder of my votes FOR,
every decision to adopt a proposal currently in its voting
period. -G.
I vote:
> 7364 1.0 Ordinary G. Ribbon Evolution
FOR
> 7365 1.0 Ordinary RoujoMarket Failure
AGAINST. The "and" is quite ambiguous in placement and can
mean two things.
> 7366 1.0 Ordinary RoujoCascading Market Failure
FOR
> 7367 3.0 Ordinary scshunt
I vote FOR 7351-7353. -G.
> 7340 2.0 Ordinary G. The Steward Sweeps
FOR
> 7341 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Oh, for the love of
FOR
> 7342 2.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Vvloppiness
FOR
> 7343 3.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Shampoo & conditioner
PRESENT
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>> 73
> 7340 2.0 Ordinary G. The Steward Sweeps
FOR
> 7341 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Oh, for the love of
FOR
> 7342 2.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Vvloppiness
PRESENT
> 7343 3.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Shampoo & conditioner
AGAINST. I think there's a better way to word this than mandati
[I think I'm just outside the voting period unless there's been
apathy. Nonetheless].
I vote:
> 7251 1 Tanner L. Swett Reduction
> 7252 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX
> 7253 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX Mk II
> 7254 3 441344, etc. DEFENSE FIX Mk III
> 7255 2 441344 A
I vote:
6895 O 1 2.0 scshunt Not Enough Time Mowing Lawns
AGAINST
6896 O 1 1.0 scshunt Lose By Even Less Respect
AGAINST
6897 O 2 1.7 scshunt More Granulation
FOR
6898 O 0 1.0 scshunt There's No I in Team, But There Is A Me
FOR
6899 O 0 1.
I vote:
> 6834 1 3.0 G. voter defaults
FOR
> 6835 1 1.0 KebaProps should not lead to a win
AGAINST
> 6836 1 3.0 G. Reward Urgency
FOR
> 6837 0 1.0 KebaLeet fix
AGAINST
> 6838 1 1.7 Kebainfinitive wins?
AGAINST
> 68
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, com...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I vote FOR all decisions to adopt proposals currently in their voting
>> periods.
>
> I retract my previous votes on all decisions with ongoing voting periods, and
> vote 'denounce omd' on each and
For each proposal current in its voting period, I vote DENOUNCE omd if
its title begins with a consonant including y, DENOUNCE G. otherwise.
-coppro
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, com...@gmail.com wrote:
> I vote FOR all decisions to adopt proposals currently in their voting periods.
I retract my previous votes on all decisions with ongoing voting periods, and
vote 'denounce omd' on each and every agoran decision currently in its voting
period. -G.
I vote FOR all decisions to adopt proposals currently in their voting periods.
>
I vote AGAINST all decisions to adopt proposals currently in their voting
periods.
-G.
I vote FOR on all Agoran Decisions in their voting period.
These have not yet met quorum.
6713 AGAINST (needs clarification to avoid stomping on any
legitimate multiple-wins-per-day that may have happened)
6714 FOR
6715 FOR
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> To remove ambiguity, I vote FOR each Agoran Decision for which I have not
> cast a vote.
Me too.
To remove ambiguity, I vote FOR each Agoran Decision for which I have
not cast a vote.
-coppro
6605 FOR
6606 AGAINST
I vote myself for IADoP and Insulator.
-coppro
I vote AGAINST each interested proposal, as many times as I can whilst
having all the votes still valid.
I vote FOR each disinterested proposal, as many times as I can whilst
having all the votes still valid.
--
ais523
> 6441 D 0 3.0 Murphy Move the synonym
FOR
> 6442 D 1 3.0 Yally Promotor CAN Remove Old Proposals
PRESENT
> 6443 O 1 1.5 Murphy Fix judicial demotion
FOR * 5
> 6444 D 0 2.0 BobTHJ Clarify Termination
ENDORSE AIS523
> 6445 O 0 1.0 coppro
I vote FOR 6407.
I vote FOR 6408.
I vote FOR 6409.
I retract my vote on 6406.
-G.
6302 - FOR
6303 - FOR
6304 - FOR
6305 - AGAINST
6306 - FOR, but needs some punctuation cleaning
6307 - FOR
6308 - FOR
6309 - 2 x AGAINST
6310 - AGAINST
6311 - FOR
6312 - FOR
6313 - FOR
6314 - 2 x AGAINST, out of sequence
6315 - FOR
6316 - 2 x FOR
6317 - FOR
6318 - 2 x FOR
6319 - FOR
6320 - FOR
632
It's been a while, I'm still catching up so I'll be conservative.
> 6257 Thesis votes O 1.0 2 coppro
PRESENT
> 6258 The Standing Court O 1.5 1 Murphy
PRESENT
> 6259 Interesting Recusals - Automatic O 1.5 1 Quazie
FOR
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Nonsense.
Yes, I thought it might be judged that way for the good of the game--
though the bug would be disastrous if judged to work. I transfer a
prop from myself to coppro, by the way, for being the one to notice
this in the first place.
U
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 09:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I vote FOR Proposal 6165 and AGAINST proposal 6166 (not because of lack of
> trust of comex-as-rulekeepor, but because I never thought ruleset
> ratification
> was a good idea to begin with...ratify everything else but let the rules be
> co
I vote FOR Proposal 6165 and AGAINST proposal 6166 (not because of lack of
trust of comex-as-rulekeepor, but because I never thought ruleset ratification
was a good idea to begin with...ratify everything else but let the rules be
corrected when need be). -Goethe
6140: FOR
6141: FOR
6142: FOR
6143: FOR
6144: FOR
6145: SELL(10VP - FOR)
6146: FOR
6147: FOR
6148: FOR
6149: ABSTAIN
6150: SELL(5VP)
6151: FOR
I vote:
6116 : FOR
6117 : FOR
6118 : AGAINST
6119 : FOR
6120 : AGAINST
-Goethe
6109 D 1 3.0 comex Right to vote
AGAINST
6110 D 1 3.0 Murphy Abstention!
FOR
6111 O 1 1.0 Yally Correction of Typos
4 x FOR, 4 x AGAINST
6112 D 1 2.0 Taral Shorten the criminal horizon
FOR
6113 D 1 3.0 Goethe Intended Proposals On
I vote as follows:
6073 D 1 3.0 Murphy Regulate self-contradiction
FOR
6074 D 0 3.0 Murphy Patch 2282a
FOR
6075 D 0 3.0 Murphy Patch 2321a
FOR
6076 D 1 3.0 woggle Isn't This What Patent Titles Are For?
AGAINST
6077 D 1 2.0 Murphy Th
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 16:36 +, Alex Smith wrote:
> I agree to the following private contract, named "6069":
> {{{
> This is a private contract, which only comex and ais523 can join.
>
> Both ais523 and comex CAN terminate this contract by announcement,
> and/or make it public by publishing its
6018 O 1 1.0 comex The AWJ's enough
3 x FOR
6019 O 1 1.0 Murphy Undo the scam already
3 x ENDORSE MURPHY
6020 D 1 2.0 Murphy Complex scoring
FOR
6021 D 1 3.0 Murphy Definition of definitions
FOR
6022 D 1 3.0 Murph
6014 O 1 1.7 Goethe Re-streamline Appeals
3 x FOR
6015 D 1 2.0 WarrigalMake notes not annoying
FOR
6016 D 1 3.0 OscarMeyr Order of the Hero
FOR
6017 D 1 3.0 Elysion Resurrect Rule 2140
IF the rule was not previously (re
6010 D 2 2.0 ais523 Rests
--- FOR
6011 D 0 3.0 Bayes Repeal 'Definition Definitions'
--- AGAINST
6012 D 0 3.0 Bayes Repeal 'Vote Protection and Cutoff
for Challenges'
--- AGAINST
6013 D 0 3.0 Bayes Repeal 'Dependent Actions'
--- AGAINST
--
I vote as follows on the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt proposals
below, where each decision is identified by the ID number of the related
proposal:
6014 FOR
6015 AGAINST
6016 PRESENT
6017 AGAINST (for now, let's sort out what the rules are first)
--
ais523
6004 D 1 2.0 woggle Pragmatize Ribbons
6005 D 1 2.0 Murphy Contract precedence
6006 D 1 2.0 Murphy Clarify equity timing
6007 O 1 1.5 SgeoThanks Murphy
6008 D 1 2.0 Perlnomic PartnershipGive partnerships a chance
6009 O 1 1.0 Sgeo
5972 D 1 2.0 rootContract terminology clean-up
FOR
5973 D 1 2.0 woggle Highly Limited Partnerships
FOR
5974 D 0 2.0 Murphy I can has grammar
FOR
5975 D 1 3.0 Murphy This sounds like a job for the
Rulekeepor
FOR
5976 O 0 1.5 Murphy
5942 O 0 1.0 woggle Transporter Accident Repair
8 x FOR
5943 D 1 2.0 woggle Secure Contestmasters
FOR
5944 D 1 2.0 Taral Senator fix
FOR
5945 D 1 2.0 rootEarly termination
FOR
5946 D 1 3.0 Murphy F
Did I ever vote on 5946-5947?
I vote AGAINST on the Agoran Decision on whether to
adopt proposal 5946, and FOR the Agoran Decision on
whether to adopt proposal 5947. These will be invalid
if I've already voted on those decisions.
--
ais523
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 5823 D 1 2.0 rootSecure contract adjustments
> AGAINST. It breaks Equity.
In that case I retract my votes and vote FOR.
I vote:
> 5823 D 1 2.0 rootSecure contract adjustments
AGAINST. It breaks Equity.
> 5824 O 1 1.0 rootClean-up on Aisle 2192
2xFOR
> 5825 D 1 3.0 Murphy Udder chaos
FOR
> 5826 O 1 1.7 Murphy Minimum disclosure for equity cases
2xAGAINST
5765 O 1 1.0 Wooble
1 x FOR, 1 x AGAINST
5766 O 0 1.0 ais523 root made me do it
1 x FOR, 1 x AGAINST
5767 D 1 2.0 Murphy Be careful what you start
FOR
5768 O 1 1.0 Murphy One-way appeals
3 x FOR
5769 D 1 3.0 Goeth
I vote:
5740: 3 x FOR
5741: FOR
5742: 3 x FOR
5743: FOR
5744: AGAINST
5745: PRESENT
5746: 3 x FOR
5747: 3 x AGAINST
5748: AGAINST
5749: 3 x AGAINST
5750: 3 x AGAINST
5751: 3 x AGAINST
5752: 1 x FOR, 1 x AGAINST
5753: AGAINST
5754: FOR (overkill of Agoran definitions)
5755: AGAINST
5756: 1 x FOR,
I vote:
>5734 O 1 1.0 Wooble No More Monster Deputy
2xAGAINST (if you need to fix the monster, add something fun to replace).
>5735 D 1 3.0 ais523 A completely terrible proposal
AGAINST
>5736 O 1 1.0 Bayes No spring ii office and
2xAGAINST
>5737 O 1 1.0 Baye
I vote:
5727: FOR
5728: FOR
5729: AGAINST
5730: FOR
5731: FOR
5732: 3 x AGAINST
5733: If it is legal for me to vote TETRAHEDRON on this proposal,
then I cast my 3 votes in the opposite of those votes would have been
were I to vote TETRAHEDRON on this proposal. Otherwise, I vote 3 x
AGAINST
5700: FOR
5701: FOR
5702: FOR
5703: FOR
5704: FOR
5705: FOR (but how does this differ from 5700?)
5706: AGAINST, it's OUR monster
5707: 3 x AGAINST
5708: 3 x AGAINST, move to split the question
5709: FOR
5710: FOR
5711: 3 x FOR
5712: FOR
5713: 3 x AGAINST
5714: FOR
5715: 3 x FOR
5716: FOR
5717: FO
I've lost track of which proposal is listed as Ordinary but is
actually Democratic. So I'm not going to split my votes this time;
the excess voting will be truncated as overvotes.
5651: 7 x AGAINST
5652: AGAINST
5653: 7 x AGAINST
5654: AGAINST (the Monster has already begun!)
5655: AGAINST
5
5636: FOR
5637: 7 x AGAINST, I'd prefer a simplification of the system.
5638: 7 x FOR
5639: FOR
5640: 7 x FOR
5643: 7 x AGAINST
5645: 7 x FOR
5646: FOR
5647: 7 x FOR
5648: AGAINST
On 5641, 5642, and 5644, I denounce tusho.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
5569: FOR
5570: AGAINST
5571: AGAINST (but please bring back INSANE PROPOSALS!)
5572: FOR
5573: 7 x AGAINST
5574: 7 x FOR
5575: 7 x FOR
5576: 7 x FOR
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
5547: FOR
5548: FOR
5549: FOR
5550: 3 x FOR, 3 x AGAINST
5551: 7 X FOR
5552: 7 X FOR
5553: AGAINST
5554: AGAINST
: FOR
5556: FOR
5557: 6 X FOR, 1 X AGAINST
5558: FOR
5559: 7 X FOR
5560: 7 X AGAINST
5561: PRESENT
5562: FOR
5563: 7 X FOR
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
5538: FOR
5539: 7 x FOR
5540: FOR (but since our Monster is not biological, this seems to be
currently a no-op)
5541: 3xFOR, 3 x AGAINST
5542: 3xFOR, 3 x AGAINST
5543: FOR
5544: AGAINST
: 7 x AGAINST (BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO
BUFFALO makes sense, but this proposal d
I vote as follows:
5521: FOR
5522: 7 x AGAINST
5523: 7 x FOR
5524: 7 x FOR
5525: FOR
5526: 7 x FOR
5527: 3 x FOR, 3 x AGAINST
5528: AGAINST
5529: AGAINST
5530: 7 X FOR
5531: FOR
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
5514: FOR
5515: 7 x AGAINST
5516: 7 x AGAINST
5517: 7 x FOR
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
5508: 7 x FOR
5509: FOR
5510: FOR
5511: 3 x FOR, 3 x AGAINST
5512: AGAINST, needs some tightening up of language.
5513: AGAINST, unneeded (unless someone rewrote R101 while I wasn't
watching)
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
For Ambassador, I vote COMEX.
For Herald, I vote IAMMARS.
--
ais523
5504: FOR
5505: 3 x FOR, 3 x AGAINST
5506: 7 x FOR
5507: 7 x FOR
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
5500: 7 x FOR
5501: FOR
5502: 7 x FOR
5503: FOR
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
5478 FOR
5479 FOR
5480 AGAINST
5476 FOR
5477 FOR x 13
5469 AGAINST x 13
5470 FOR x 13
5471 FOR x 13
5472 FOR x 13
5473 AGAINST x 13
5474 FOR x 13
5475 FOR x 13
5454 FOR x 13
5456 FOR
5457 FOR x 13
5458 FOR x 13
5459 FOR
I vote:
> 5446 O2 1Pavitra What Are We?
10x AGAINST
> 5447 D1 2Pavitra Provincial Voice in Government (Lesser)
AGAINST
> 5448 D1 3Pavitra Provincial Voice in Government (Greater)
AGAINST
> 5449 D0 2avpxG
FOR
> 5450 D1 3Murphy Optional is
5446: PRESENT
5447: PRESENT
5448: PRESENT
5449: 7 x AGAINST
5450: FOR
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
I may have to deregister soon, as I may be away for several weeks and
really don't need a-d filling up my inbox. Plus I haven't been
paying much attention to Agora for several months.
Meanwhile:
5441: 7 x AGAINST (v3 is in the queue)
5442: 3 x FOR, 3 x AGAINST
5443: AGAINST
5444: 7 x AGAINS
I vote:
5427: 10xAGAINST
(nice Rule addition, but could we quit with all the undefined Patent Titles
please?)
5428: 10xAGAINST
(I'm a believer in equity)
5429: AGAINST
(I'm still uncomfortable with the criminalization of judgements, so any
loopholes
are good to keep).
5430: 10xFOR
5431
5427: AGAINSTx4
5428: AGAINSTx4
5429: FOR
5430: FORx4
5431: AGAINST (I tried to retract this, because it was in error)
5432: FOR
5433: FOR
avpx
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
