On 2020-07-12 4:25 p.m., ais523 via agora-business wrote:
On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 16:02 +, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
I submit the following Diplonomic Proposal, titled "Judicial Veto":
{
To the end of Rule 8, append: "If enacting a proposal would
interfere
with the Judge's ability
On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 16:02 +, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following Diplonomic Proposal, titled "Judicial Veto":
>
> {
> To the end of Rule 8, append: "If enacting a proposal would
> interfere
> with the Judge's ability to ensure the smooth running of the game in
>
On 2020-07-12 4:02 p.m., Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
On 2020-07-12 2:05 p.m., Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
On 7/11/20 11:59 PM, omd via agora-business wrote:
at 8:42 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion
wrote:
I think this is missing 'replacing "more supply centers than
On 2020-07-12 2:05 p.m., Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
On 7/11/20 11:59 PM, omd via agora-business wrote:
at 8:42 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion
wrote:
I think this is missing 'replacing "more supply centers than units" with
"more Supply than its number of units"'.
I'm not sure
On 2020-07-12 3:59 a.m., omd via agora-business wrote:
at 8:42 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion
wrote:
I think this is missing 'replacing "more supply centers than units"
with "more Supply than its number of units"'.
I'm not sure what the proposal does in the case that a player has more
at 8:42 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion
wrote:
I think this is missing 'replacing "more supply centers than units" with
"more Supply than its number of units"'.
I'm not sure what the proposal does in the case that a player has more
Supply than units, but not more supply centres than
On 2020-07-12 3:42 a.m., Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
On 2020-07-12 2:05 a.m., omd via agora-business wrote:
I retract my previous Diplonomic Proposal.
I submit the following Diplonomic Proposal, titled “Disagreeable
Proposal":
{{
Create a new Diplonomic rule:
{
All Contestants who
