On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 9:52 AM 4st nomic via agora-discussion < agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I object. > Per Rule 2576 "Ownership", the asset goes into abeyance as soon as the > owner is ambiguous. > The owner becomes ambiguous at step 2, wherein we are not sure if ais523 > can take the asset due to the ensuing contradiction. > Therefore, both CFJs should be FALSE, as neither party can cash a promise > that is in abeyance. > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 3:39 PM Edward Murphy via agora-business < > agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > Attempted actions (#2 through #5 were all in the same message): > > > > 1) ais523 grants Promise Q to the Library. > > 2) ais523 takes Promise Q from the Library per R2618 "Any player CAN". > > 3) ais523 transfers Promise Q to Yachay. > > 4) ais523 takes Promise Q from the Library per R2618 "Any player CAN". > > 5) ais523 cashes Promise Q. > (On the grounds of "Ship of Theseus" problem, wherein, the radiance stone had some qualities changed and the owner thereby became ambiguous, SHOULD have also gone straight into abeyance as the owner was equally ambiguous.) -- 4ˢᵗ Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
