I'm very sorry. I saw this earlier and just forgot about it until now. I transfer Trigon 5 shinies (which will be obsolete soon anyway, but oh well).
-Aris On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 12:50 AM Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote: > *cries because I spent literally hours today making the automation because > I thought it was going to be enacted tomorrow without any problems.* > > On Feb 11, 2018 01:46, "Aris Merchant" <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:02 PM Edward Murphy <emurph...@zoho.com> wrote: > > > > > > 8008* CB [1] 1.0 Picto-Nomic CB [1] 3 > sh. > > > http://textbook.stpauls.br/International_Economics/images/pic061.jpg > > > > 8009* Trigon, [2] 2.6 PAoaM v6 [3] Trigon 3 > sh. > > > PRESENT > > > > > > I retract any previous vote on 8009, and vote AGAINST. It says "Replace > > all occurances of "shiny" and "shinies" in the ruleset in the > > order they appear with "coin" and "coins" respectively", but does not > > provide any definition for "the order they appear". Acending numericial > > order would be clear, but I'm not sure what this refers to. The SLR? The > > FLR? The one from last week, or the first one ever published? It's > > ambiguous. In fact, we were relying on that to fix a use of one of those > in > > the proposal itself, which 1. it can't now and 2. won't be in any > published > > ruleset by the time this is resolved. Trigon, I'm sorry I didn't point > this > > out sooner. > > > > -Aris > > >
