Ian Kelly wrote:
On 9/9/06, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposal: High-Power Deference
(AI = 3, please)
Amend Rule 1482 (Precedence between Rules with Unequal Power) by
appending
this text:
If the Rule with the higher Power explicitly says of itself
that it
defers
Murphy wrote:
Rule 698 (Always an Eligible Judge)
was silent on the eligibility of non-active players before the
adoption of Proposal 4867, and remained silent after its adoption.
Whups! Missed deleting the word active in several places, and
now there's no ruleset definition. CFJs 1500 and
On Sep 5, 2006, at 8:03 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:Agora NomicDistribution of Proposals 4869-4870September 05, 2006I think the Speaker is the vote collector under the new rules. Is this correct?If so, would the Glorious Speaker please collect the votes.If not, I think it falls back on me.
On 9/18/06, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If so, would the Glorious Speaker please collect the votes.
Not me! *dances*
--
The Goddess Eris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can't prove anything.
-- Gödel's Incompetence Theorem
4 matches
Mail list logo
