Nice one! Although I'm not sure there's really any utility in calling
a CFJ that can't be assigned, other than to annoy the CotC.
By the way, no need to bar me: I deregistered in December.
-root
On 1/10/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the ruleset has slimmed down a bit since I was
On 1/10/07, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I register again. :D
You deregistered on 13 December, so rule 869 prohibits you from
registering today.
--
Michael Slone
AWW!
On 1/10/07, Michael Slone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/10/07, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I register again. :D
You deregistered on 13 December, so rule 869 prohibits you from
registering today.
--
Michael Slone
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can't prove anything.
-- Gödel's
Checking that my server-side mail-filtering will put this message in
the right place.
Michael.
Ian Kelly wrote:
other than to annoy the CotC.
If e got annoyed by this, wouldn't e be violating 698/15(b)(3) don't
panic?
By the way, no need to bar me: I deregistered in December.
Oops, missed that. It's been a rapid catch-up for me. Now to find out
why no one's sure whether Goethe is a
root wrote:
Nice one! Although I'm not sure there's really any utility in calling
a CFJ that can't be assigned, other than to annoy the CotC.
But what about the utility of calling a CFJ with only one eligible
judge (of the caller's choosing)? I agree, nice one, Zefram!
-Goethe
I wrote:
why no one's sure whether Goethe is a Player...
Ah, found it. It's trivial: game custom is that where part of a Rule
makes no sense then the remainder of it is applied as far as possible.
The CotC's posting of the Writ deregisters the Player, and the
instructing the Registrar bit is
Kerim Aydin wrote:
But what about the utility of calling a CFJ with only one eligible
judge (of the caller's choosing)? I agree, nice one, Zefram!
Heh. What I like is that there's a procedure to unlink the CFJs,
which would resolve the problem, but you can't do it until a Judge has
been
Goethe wrote:
ps. if you like the new rule 101, want to try to gut the judicial
system... I ran out of steam on that one and we still need judicial
reform (reform the mechanics to match R101 and the rest).
Something along the lines of this outline?
i. Every person has the right to
9 matches
Mail list logo