DIS: Re: BUS: registration and CFJs

2007-01-10 Thread Ian Kelly
Nice one! Although I'm not sure there's really any utility in calling a CFJ that can't be assigned, other than to annoy the CotC. By the way, no need to bar me: I deregistered in December. -root On 1/10/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see the ruleset has slimmed down a bit since I was

DIS: Re: BUS: registration and CFJs

2007-01-10 Thread Michael Slone
On 1/10/07, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I register again. :D You deregistered on 13 December, so rule 869 prohibits you from registering today. -- Michael Slone

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: registration and CFJs

2007-01-10 Thread Taral
AWW! On 1/10/07, Michael Slone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/10/07, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I register again. :D You deregistered on 13 December, so rule 869 prohibits you from registering today. -- Michael Slone -- Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can't prove anything. -- Gödel's

DIS: test

2007-01-10 Thread Michael Norrish
Checking that my server-side mail-filtering will put this message in the right place. Michael.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: registration and CFJs

2007-01-10 Thread Zefram
Ian Kelly wrote: other than to annoy the CotC. If e got annoyed by this, wouldn't e be violating 698/15(b)(3) don't panic? By the way, no need to bar me: I deregistered in December. Oops, missed that. It's been a rapid catch-up for me. Now to find out why no one's sure whether Goethe is a

DIS: Re: BUS: registration and CFJs

2007-01-10 Thread Kerim Aydin
root wrote: Nice one! Although I'm not sure there's really any utility in calling a CFJ that can't be assigned, other than to annoy the CotC. But what about the utility of calling a CFJ with only one eligible judge (of the caller's choosing)? I agree, nice one, Zefram! -Goethe

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: registration and CFJs

2007-01-10 Thread Zefram
I wrote: why no one's sure whether Goethe is a Player... Ah, found it. It's trivial: game custom is that where part of a Rule makes no sense then the remainder of it is applied as far as possible. The CotC's posting of the Writ deregisters the Player, and the instructing the Registrar bit is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: registration and CFJs

2007-01-10 Thread Zefram
Kerim Aydin wrote: But what about the utility of calling a CFJ with only one eligible judge (of the caller's choosing)? I agree, nice one, Zefram! Heh. What I like is that there's a procedure to unlink the CFJs, which would resolve the problem, but you can't do it until a Judge has been

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: registration and CFJs

2007-01-10 Thread Ed Murphy
Goethe wrote: ps. if you like the new rule 101, want to try to gut the judicial system... I ran out of steam on that one and we still need judicial reform (reform the mechanics to match R101 and the rest). Something along the lines of this outline? i. Every person has the right to