Maud wrote:
4932 AGAINST -- (I've missed some discussion. Aren't these
4933 AGAINST -- attempting to do basically the same thing?)
The difference is whether an Excess CFJ that gets assigned may
still be refused.
4935 FOR (Why ``contentiousness''? I mean, I know why, but why?)
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I'm voting against this, because I don't see Zefram adding emself to
the map in this proposal.
Eep. I thought I'd attract votes against if I *did* add anything.
-zefram
On 4/25/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Or, of course, you could volunteer to take over as Promotor, eh?
I'm up for that. My manifesto: if elected I'll distribute proposals
promptly, in semi-weekly batches, to keep the game moving. Proposals will
generally wait
4930 | Simple VC win | Goethe| 1* | 02Apr07 | D
FOR
4931 | Herald to advertise | Zefram| 1 | 04Apr07 | O
FOR
4932 | Clarifying Excess CFJs | Levi | 1 | 05Apr07 | O
AGAINST
4933 | constrained refusal of e... | Zefram| 1 | 05Apr07 | O
FOR
Murphy wrote:
Create a rule titled The International Associate Director of Personnel
with this text:
Create a rule titled The Assessor with this text:
Certainly, at the very least, we can combine these two into a single
new office?
Proto: The Decisor is an Office with the responsibility
Sherlock wrote:
4943 | Reward and Punishment | Goethe| 3 | 20Apr07 | D
AGAINST -- punishing recusal is fine, punishing being overturned is not.
No worries, but punishment for being overturned is already in the rule,
not added by me, so you should prefer the new version by your
quazie wrote:
4930 | Simple VC win | Goethe| 1* | 02Apr07 | D
FOR
Not to the PF.
Ian Kelly wrote:
Would you be willing to take over the proposal archive as well?
I'd love to. Proposals are actually the next thing I want to archive
systematically, after rules. I'll make the record as complete as
possible.
currently exists as a postgres database, a suite of poorly organized
On 4/25/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I'm voting against this, because I don't see Zefram adding emself to
the map in this proposal.
Eep. I thought I'd attract votes against if I *did* add anything.
Yes!
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can't prove anything.
On Apr 25, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Murphy wrote:
Create a rule titled The International Associate Director of
Personnel
with this text:
Create a rule titled The Assessor with this text:
Certainly, at the very least, we can combine these two into a single
new office?
10 matches
Mail list logo
