DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Disambiguate voter eligibility

Ed Murphy wrote: Amend Rule 1950 (Voting Limits) by replacing submitted by an eligible voter with submitted by each voter. Should also change each voting limit of an eligible voter to voting limit of an entity in that rule. Otherwise fine. -zefram

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: The Standing Court

Ed Murphy wrote: Proposal: The Standing Court The question has recently been raised of whether merely quoting a proposal in this fashion is sufficient to indicate submission of it. You may want to disambiguate. A player is ineligible to be Trial Judge of a CFJ if e was not

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1631 assigned to OscarMeyr

On Apr 29, 2007, at 10:39 PM, Zefram wrote: Benjamin Schultz wrote: (Had comex simply said hi in the message body, I would've taken that as at least SOME indication of a clear intent to register.) I disagree with this part. I think hi alone is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: proposals on activity

Ed Murphy wrote: We really should re-enact Switches. I support this

DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 4947 - 4957

The validity of BobTHJ's votes only affects the outcome of Proposal 4953, which has null effect anyway since Proposal 4952 failed. Additional note: The validity of my 8th and 9th votes per proposal did not affect any of the outcomes.