On 5/11/07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious here. A partnership could be re-written to be a nomic,
(BobTHJ's excellent corporation practically is a nomic) so other than
discussion over the term person, is there a difference between
allowing partnerships to be legislators and
Roger Hicks wrote:
To take the concept of Partnerships to the next level,
Interesting. I've been wondering about the potential for partnerships
to become internally nomic-like, but the Pineapple-style agreement is
sufficiently lightweight that it wouldn't naturally tend towards such
a result. I
On May 10, 2007, at 9:52 PM, Michael Slone wrote:
On 5/10/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend to make myself Promotor, with Agoran Consent.
I object.
Out of curiousity, Maud, what for?
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
Roger Hicks wrote:
Also, Primo Corporation hereby registers as a player.
You need at least two players subject to the charter, otherwise you
don't have a binding agreement. Who are the current Shareholders?
-zefram
Maud wrote:
For the Agoran decision of whether to adopt and ecumenical
^^^ an
proposal, the eligible voters are all legislators, the quorum is
what it would be if only active players of Agora were eligible
voters, the
quazie wrote:
Create a rule entitled Roll Call with the folowing text
Cambot!
Gypsy!
Tom Servo!
Croow!
6 matches
Mail list logo
