Ed Murphy wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
A Property Owning Entity (hereafter POE) is a type of entity. POEs may
Why not just Owner?
The word owner is used to refer to the one who owns some piece of
Property. A POE dose not necessarily own anything, e just has the
capacity to do so. I suggest Magnate in
Roger Hicks wrote:
At the beginning of each month, every natural
person who is a POE pays a percentage of their Currency equal to the Tax
Levy to the Agoran Treasury (rounding down to the nearest Agoran Dollar).
So everyone will put their currency holdings into
Thanks for your comments! I have incorporated them into the final draft.
BobTHJ
On 5/15/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
a Property is ever not owned by a POE, it ceases to exist.
You probably don't want Properties popping out of existence like that.
Especially if the
Murphy's proposal 4939 (Re-divide some offices) contained the
following provision.
Create a rule titled The Registrar with this text:
The Registrar is an office; its holder is responsible for keeping
track of players.
The Registrar's report shall include the following:
a)
comex wrote:
I execute a Timing Order directing the Clerk of the Courts to select a
Trial Judge for CFJ 1659.
I assume you intend to activate the last paragraph of Rule 1006,
but I'm not sure whether it works when the office in question
is vacant.
Ed Murphy wrote:
Due to Rules 1006 and 1450, the office of CotC is currently
vacant. Or, under a different interpretation, I am being
continuously assigned by 1006 and removed by 1450, which is
no better.
R1006 says that an office that would otherwise be vacant is held by the
Speaker. This
On 5/16/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
R889 says
The Clerk of the Courts ... is an office, but in most other rules
the Clerk of the Courts is a player with certain obligations.
At least R1006:
The holder of an office may be referred to by the name of the
office.
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Due to Rules 1006 and 1450, the office of CotC is currently
vacant. Or, under a different interpretation, I am being
continuously assigned by 1006 and removed by 1450, which is
no better.
R1006 says that an office that would otherwise be vacant is held by the
Ed Murphy wrote:
Unless the Speaker cannot hold that office.
Which R1450 doesn't prevent. R1450 only triggers when the Speaker is
already CotC.
-zefram
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Unless the Speaker cannot hold that office.
Which R1450 doesn't prevent. R1450 only triggers when the Speaker is
already CotC.
It depends whether you interpret mutually exclusive as a prohibition
(with the next clause amounting to if someone pushes me, I
Ed Murphy wrote:
4970 FOR
4971 FOR
4972 FOR
4973 PRESENT
4974 PRESENT
4975 FOR
I vote in the following manner:
If Murphy has voted on a proposal as of 5/16/07 @ 9:50pm (PST), I vote
in the same manner as e has.
quazie wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
4970 FOR
4971 FOR
4972 FOR
4973 PRESENT
4974 PRESENT
4975 FOR
I vote in the following manner:
If Murphy has voted on a proposal as of 5/16/07 @ 9:50pm (PST), I vote
in the same manner as e has.
Alas, not to the PF.
12 matches
Mail list logo