Zefram wrote:
[The Order system is obsolete. With Timing Orders gone, the only
remaining type of Order would be Legislative Orders, but a proposal
can do whatever it wants anyway without requiring this bulky mechanism
in the ruleset.]
Proposals with ongoing effects have always been a bit fuzz
Proto-Proposal: Interest Index
(AI = 2, please)
Change the title of Rule 2153 to "Interest Index", and amend it to read:
The interest index of a proposal is a non-negative integer with
a default value of 1 and a maximum value of 3. Before the
Promotor distributes a proposal,
Ed Murphy wrote:
> a) When a proposal is adopted, its proposer gains Red VCs equal
Coauthors should not get a reward for a disinterested proposal.
Otherwise looks good.
-zefram
Second thoughts: with Red VC rewards now varying massively in magnitude,
the one-per-week clause needs to be refined. I think that in each week
each proposer should receive the largest single Red VC reward available
from eir proposals that week, rather than whichever was chronologically
first. Ho
Zefram wrote:
Second thoughts: with Red VC rewards now varying massively in magnitude,
the one-per-week clause needs to be refined. I think that in each week
each proposer should receive the largest single Red VC reward available
from eir proposals that week, rather than whichever was chronolog
proto-proposal: tighten definition of VCs
AI: 2
{{{
Amend rule 2126 by replacing the text
Voting Credits (VCs) are a measure of each player's ability to
affect voting limits on ordinary proposals. VCs CANNOT be
affected except as described in this rule.
When a player re
6 matches
Mail list logo
