root wrote:
From an alternative standpoint, after Rule 2110/2 was replaced with
Rule 2110/3, the former version could no longer affect the game in any
way; thus it could not cause a win, and this CFJ would be FALSE. This
interpretation is troubling when applied to other rules; for example,
a r
On Nov 24, 2007 3:35 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Murphy: SUPPORT
> pikhq: SUPPORT
> Zefram: SUPPORT
> comex: SUPPORT
> BobTHJ: SUPPORT
> OscarMeyr: SUPPORT
>
>
> Taral: OBJECT
> Goethe: OBJECT
> Wooble: OBJECT
> Levi: OBJECT
>
> The following votes were not counted:
> Fookiemy
On Saturday 24 November 2007 15:56:05 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> > I assumed that nobody would mind me using the backup forum, which is not
> > actually *used*. . . But, at your behest, I think I'll find a new forum
for
> > this Nomic. . .
>
> The old c
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> I assumed that nobody would mind me using the backup forum, which is not
> actually *used*. . . But, at your behest, I think I'll find a new forum for
> this Nomic. . .
The old claustronomic mailing list is still turned on if you want it.
Still waiti
On Saturday 24 November 2007 15:41:31 comex wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2007 4:35 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Agora hereby requests to become a player in B Nomic.
> Faction :D
>
Sure. It also counts as a faction. :D
On Nov 24, 2007 4:35 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agora hereby requests to become a player in B Nomic.
Faction :D
pikhq wrote:
I voyage to Esperanto. This is an unregulated action; however, by rule 2105,
this is a valid Agoran location.
I still want to see someone come up with an interesting location-based
sub-game. I still remember the Tubthumping Room...
On Saturday 24 November 2007 14:11:40 Ed Murphy wrote:
> pikhq wrote:
>
> > Mi voyagxas al Esperanto.
>
> Que?
>
>
I voyage to Esperanto. This is an unregulated action; however, by rule 2105,
this is a valid Agoran location.
pikhq wrote:
Mi voyagxas al Esperanto.
Que?
On Saturday 24 November 2007 13:34:43 Nick Vanderweit wrote:
> Hello, all. I am a friend of pikhq, and he recently introduced me to
> the world of Agora nomic. I've been reading the mailing lists for a
> week or so, and it all sounds very interesting. So, I'd like to
> register as a first-class pla
On Saturday 24 November 2007 12:53:48 Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2007 1:15 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I assumed that nobody would mind me using the backup forum, which is not
> > actually *used*. . . But, at your behest, I think I'll find a new forum
for
> > this Nomic.
On Nov 24, 2007 1:15 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assumed that nobody would mind me using the backup forum, which is not
> actually *used*. . . But, at your behest, I think I'll find a new forum for
> this Nomic. . .
Thanks. The problem with the backup fora is just that eve
On Saturday 24 November 2007 12:09:34 Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2007 11:58 AM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to use Tue and/or Yoyo for any further discussion about this
> > contract.
>
> Since sub-nomics tend to generate a lot of messages, I would
> appreciate it if
On Nov 24, 2007 11:58 AM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to use Tue and/or Yoyo for any further discussion about this
> contract.
Since sub-nomics tend to generate a lot of messages, I would
appreciate it if you would use a foreign rather than public forum for
this, as Prim
On Nov 23, 2007 6:57 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If everyone's VLOP is to be 4, why not just:
I for one am not in favor of repealing VCs or marks (yet), just partnerships.
-root
15 matches
Mail list logo
