Ed Murphy wrote:
OscarMeyr wrote:
I just looked over these registration dates. Are they correct -- am I
the ONLY player who did not (re)register this year?
Yes. I deregistered so that Michael could keep the record for
longest continuous registration
Heh; thanks for that. :)
Michael.
On Nov 26, 2007 8:49 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/26/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Registrar's report includes a list of all Senators.
>
> Why? This can be inferred from registration dates.
Largely because I'm already reporting it, and it fits well into the
On 11/26/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Registrar's report includes a list of all Senators.
Why? This can be inferred from registration dates.
> The Assessor's report includes the most recent date on which an
> emergency session was called.
This is useful.
>
OscarMeyr wrote:
I just looked over these registration dates. Are they correct -- am I
the ONLY player who did not (re)register this year?
Yes. I deregistered so that Michael could keep the record for
longest continuous registration, and also to test the ramifications
of a partnership (the A
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:20 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I am inclined to concur with Goethe's arguments as Appellant. Trial
Judge Goddess Eris's arguments do nothing to address the case, so on
first brush I want to reassign the case. I'm interested in what my
fellow J
On Nov 26, 2007, at 6:42 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007 4:35 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just looked over these registration dates. Are they correct -- am
I the ONLY player who did not (re)register this year?
Yes, you're the only player who hasn't registered this
On Nov 26, 2007 4:35 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just looked over these registration dates. Are they correct -- am
> I the ONLY player who did not (re)register this year?
Yes, you're the only player who hasn't registered this year. I blame
Goethe for starting a deregistra
On Nov 26, 2007, at 12:44 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
Here and Gone Again: a Registrar's Report
Date of this Report: Mon 26 Nov 2007
Nickname E-mail address RegisteredActivity
--
avpx [EMAIL PROTECT
On Nov 24, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Nick Vanderweit wrote:
Hello, all. I am a friend of pikhq, and he recently introduced me to
the world of Agora nomic. I've been reading the mailing lists for a
week or so, and it all sounds very interesting. So, I'd like to
register as a first-class player, preferabl
On Nov 26, 2007 4:27 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote for WOOBLE, but will gladly change my vote to Pikhq or comex
> for almost any reasonable offer.
> -
> Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
> OscarMeyr
>
Where is the love?
I will spend all the VCs currently in my possession to in
I vote as follows:
> NUM FL AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> 5312 D1 4Wooble Protective Alliance
FOR
> 5313 D1 3Murphy The Republic of Agora
FOR
> 5314 D1 3Murphy Return of the secret ballot
PRESENT
> 5315 D1 3Murphy Claims of error, redux
PRESENT
> 5316 D1
On 11/26/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote OBJECT.
NTTPF.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Nov 26, 2007 10:04 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BobTHJ wrote:
>
> > I could have swore that Primo was the first partnership with a
> > non-player member (as several players of B became Primo shareholders).
> > Perhaps I am mistaken however.
>
> I don't remember this happening. The
BobTHJ wrote:
I could have swore that Primo was the first partnership with a
non-player member (as several players of B became Primo shareholders).
Perhaps I am mistaken however.
I don't remember this happening. They may certainly have talked
about it, though.
root wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007 2:06 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
root attempted to register square root (emself, acting as a corporation
sole) and Nemo (no one, acting as a soulless corporation). CFJs 1682
and 1683 held that agreements must be made among two or more players.
I attem
Goethe wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
BUS: Proto-Thesis: 2007, the Year of Partnerships
What degree is this for?
I don't know. Since Rule 1367 no longer contains any objective
standards, I'll probably submit a proposal recognizing pseudo-votes
at each level.
PRE-HISTORY
On Nov 26, 2007 2:06 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> root attempted to register square root (emself, acting as a corporation
> sole) and Nemo (no one, acting as a soulless corporation). CFJs 1682
> and 1683 held that agreements must be made among two or more players.
I attempted to reg
On Nov 26, 2007 2:06 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Association of Federated Organizations (comex, Levi, and Murphy;
> later pikhq) registered in September, allowing any member to control it
> without prior consultation. During Murphy's brief deregistration, it
> was the first part
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> BUS: Proto-Thesis: 2007, the Year of Partnerships
What degree is this for?
> PRE-HISTORY
If you're going to start in deep pre-history and jump to present, you should
include a (very) brief history of agreements to mention the mousetrap, SLCs,
and consen
[Primo] became de facto inactive in July, and was dissolved
by Issue (proposal) 26 in October.
Will add a mention that this tested the dissolution-by-unanimous-
agreement clause; one partner directly opposed Issue 26, but indirectly
agreed to abide by the voting results on Issues in general.
On Nov 24, 2007 10:26 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to be bound by the following agreement:
>
> 1) The name of this contest is the Fantasy Rules Contest.
>
I agree to be bound by this agreement.
BobTHJ
On Nov 24, 2007 8:01 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried making Agora a B Nomic faction with Agoran consent, and went ahead and
> tried making it a B Nomic player instead. So, I'm an idiot.
>
> Let's do this right.
>
> With Agoran Consent, I intend to make Agora be a player in
Can someone post an updated ruleset? I'm lost. :(
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On 11/25/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>b) A player may spend 10 Marks in each of N+1 different colors
> to increase another player's voting limit on a specified
> ordinary proposal by N, where N >= 1.
Looks like it might create a yucky race condition. Right
On 11/24/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> subject of rights and obligations under the rules. An
> biological organism that is capable of communicating by email in
An -> A
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-
25 matches
Mail list logo
