Josiah Worcester wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/agoras-child Voila.
Does this operate as a mailing list? It doesn't seem to have any way to
subscribe other than by having a Google Account, which is presumably
concerned with the Google Groups website. I've always found these groups
* Change N+1 to increase another player's VVLOP by N
to N to increase another player's VVLOP by floor(N/2)
* Change N+2 to increase your own VVLOP by N
to N to increase your own VVLOP by floor(N/3)
* Change N+1 to decrease another player's VVLOP by N
to N to decrease
Ed Murphy wrote:
(+B) At the end of each week, each player who assigned a
judgement to at least one judicial question (other than a
question on sentencing) during that week without violating
a time limit gains one Blue VC.
I prefer the present
Ed Murphy wrote:
Proposal: White VCs for mentors
This makes it relatively easy for established players to get white VCs.
I deliberately made them difficult to get.
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
d) A player may spend 10 Marks in each of N+1 different colors
to decrease another player's voting limit on a specified
ordinary proposal by N (to a minimum of zero).
This will encourage duplication of contentious proposals, so that
supporters' voting
Josiah Worcester wrote:
Retract *that*, and submit this (No decay, AI=2, II=2, co-author is avpx):
II=2 is not justified.
-zefram
Taral wrote:
Can someone post an updated ruleset? I'm lost. :(
I will, sometime this week. I need to figure out which proposals were
adopted in which order. I'm not convinced that all of them that Murphy
has purported to resolve have been correctly resolved.
Right now I'm concentrating on
Ian Kelly wrote:
Pseudo-judgement: CFJ 1800 - TRUE
You are overdue to deliver real judgement in CFJ 1800.
-zefram
== CFJ 1805 ==
Statement: CFJ 1799 is an inquiry case on the permissibility of an action.
Since the judge in CFJ 1799 already ruled that the statement in that
case was nonsensical, this should be an easy FALSE.
-zefram
On Nov 27, 2007 9:32 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just because the action itself was nonsensical does not prevent the
inquiry itself from being about permissibility. In my opinion this is
an easy TRUE.
So you claim that to
On Nov 27, 2007 9:43 AM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 9:32 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just because the action itself was nonsensical does not prevent the
inquiry itself from being about permissibility. In my opinion this is
an easy TRUE.
So you claim
Roger Hicks wrote:
The question is not Is it possible to perform
nkep or what happens when I perform nkep but is it permissible to
perform nkep.
For the purposes of R2110, the most relevant question is is nkep
an action?. root's what happens if I perform nkep? tackles the
On Nov 26, 2007 4:54 PM, levi.stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:20 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I am inclined to concur with Goethe's arguments as Appellant. Trial
Judge Goddess Eris's arguments do nothing to address the case, so on
first
On Nov 27, 2007 9:50 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the definition of nkep and what occurs when you perform it are
largely irrelevant. The question is not Is it possible to perform
nkep or what happens when I perform nkep but is it permissible to
perform nkep. Since nkep is
On 11/27/07, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless I left out a different word and am introducing myself as swing
the mightily. :-)
Like if I was to introduce myself as deregister... :
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 09:17:55 Zefram wrote:
I hereby recuse pikhq from CFJ 1783. I hereby assign OscarMeyr as judge
of CFJ 1783.
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1783
== CFJ 1783 ==
Type:
Josiah Worcester wrote:
You cannot recuse. I sentenced him to APOLOGY. This case is already closed.
As I indicated at the time, APOLOGY alone is not a valid sentence.
APOLOGY must be accompanied by a set of prescribed words. The empty set
is valid, but (as I interpret it) must be stated
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 17:10:23 Zefram wrote:
Josiah Worcester wrote:
You cannot recuse. I sentenced him to APOLOGY. This case is already closed.
As I indicated at the time, APOLOGY alone is not a valid sentence.
APOLOGY must be accompanied by a set of prescribed words. The empty set
On Nov 27, 2007 5:14 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the first I saw of that indication. I blame you for my loss of VCs (if
any).
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2007-November/008101.html
The message was in the public forum, so it doesn't
On Tuesday 27 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I retract this, and submit the same CFJ, except that I bar Zefram from
judging it.
You forgot that retraction may or may not have passed for some reason.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Nov 27, 2007 5:33 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You forgot that retraction may or may not have passed for some reason.
I think the problem to which Zefram has alluded is that the resolution
of proposals 5296, 5300, 5301, and 5302 included incorrect tallies of
the votes, and the
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 18:03:47 comex wrote:
On Tuesday 27 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I would like to encourage everyone to vote against my first, somewhat
malformed proposal entitled No decay! (5323) So, I will grant 100 blue
marks to all who vote against it (regardless of
As of the last Herald's report (June 21), these players were already
recorded as having Long Service titles:
Three Months Long Service: Goddess Eris, Goethe, Sherlock
Six Months Long Service: Michael, Murphy, OscarMeyr, root, Sherlock
Nine Months Long Service:Michael, Murphy,
Of course, /right/ after I send that out, I remember that another
batch of Red Marks were platonically awarded about an hour ago.
Corrections coming up shortly.
On 11/27/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this operate as a mailing list? It doesn't seem to have any way to
subscribe other than by having a Google Account, which is presumably
concerned with the Google Groups website. I've always found these groups
impossible to use as a serious
25 matches
Mail list logo
