Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Brainfuck Golf] Results for Hole #2

2008-01-20 Thread Ian Kelly
On Jan 20, 2008 8:07 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could someone double-check this? It passed my unit tests, at least, > which were something like >1 1+ >10 1- >10 11* >110 11/ I'll be happy to award you the points if I'm proven wrong. I would've asked you about it f

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1831: remanded to Goddess Eris

2008-01-20 Thread Ed Murphy
root wrote: CFJs 1295 and 1533 have similar histories. List of all cases on record as appealed twice: 1268 T, reassign, T, sustain 1295 T, reassign (2/1 over sustain), F, reassign, T 1533 F, remand, T, remand (2/1 over reverse), F 1550 F, sustain (2/1 over remand), reverse (2/1 over s

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1864: assign Goddess Eris

2008-01-20 Thread Ed Murphy
pikhq wrote: On Sunday 20 January 2008 20:59:22 Taral wrote: On 1/14/08, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I hereby assign Goddess Eris as judge of CFJ 1864. I judge TRUE. One of the members of the Left Hand has stated that the Right Hand agreement provides for one or another of the partners

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1864: assign Goddess Eris

2008-01-20 Thread Josiah Worcester
On Sunday 20 January 2008 20:59:22 Taral wrote: > On 1/14/08, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I hereby assign Goddess Eris as judge of CFJ 1864. > > I judge TRUE. One of the members of the Left Hand has stated that the > Right Hand agreement provides for one or another of the partners to > sa

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1831: remanded to Goddess Eris

2008-01-20 Thread Ian Kelly
On Jan 20, 2008 8:34 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/20/08, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Initiated by pikhq: 10 Dec 2007 01:25:39 GMT > > Judge Goethe assigned: 10 Dec 2007 10:24:26 GMT > > Judged TRUE by Goethe: 10 Dec 2007

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1831: remanded to Goddess Eris

2008-01-20 Thread Josiah Worcester
On Sunday 20 January 2008 20:34:54 Taral wrote: > On 1/20/08, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Initiated by pikhq: 10 Dec 2007 01:25:39 GMT > > Judge Goethe assigned: 10 Dec 2007 10:24:26 GMT > > Judged TRUE by Goethe: 10 Dec 2007 18:22:07

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Brainfuck Golf] Hole #3

2008-01-20 Thread Ian Kelly
On Jan 20, 2008 8:24 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's tiring for me is the programs that are moderately complex. > > Try something much, much simpler. . . This allows people's skills at tiny code > to truly shine. > (I'm reminded of a golf round I played in a chatroom to do

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Brainfuck Golf] Hole #3

2008-01-20 Thread Ian Kelly
On Jan 20, 2008 8:21 PM, Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Point of information: The character 0x00 is the ASCII Null Character. > There is no ASCII EOF character. Unix has traditionally used 0x04 > (End Of Transmission) to indicate end of file on character streams, > although it is not s

DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1831: remanded to Goddess Eris

2008-01-20 Thread Taral
On 1/20/08, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Initiated by pikhq: 10 Dec 2007 01:25:39 GMT > Judge Goethe assigned: 10 Dec 2007 10:24:26 GMT > Judged TRUE by Goethe: 10 Dec 2007 18:22:07 GMT > Appeal 1831a: 10 Dec 200

DIS: Re: BUS: [Brainfuck Golf] Hole #3

2008-01-20 Thread Josiah Worcester
On Sunday 20 January 2008 19:51:47 Ian Kelly wrote: > I think the mathematical tasks may be tiring to some, so I'm going to > try something else this time. The third task for Brainfuck Golf is to > implement Unix sort. The input is to be read as a sequence of ASCII > lines, each terminated with a

DIS: Re: BUS: [Brainfuck Golf] Hole #3

2008-01-20 Thread Buddha Buck
On Jan 20, 2008 9:51 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the mathematical tasks may be tiring to some, so I'm going to > try something else this time. The third task for Brainfuck Golf is to > implement Unix sort. The input is to be read as a sequence of ASCII > lines, each termina

DIS: Re: BUS: [Brainfuck Golf] Results for Hole #2

2008-01-20 Thread Ed Murphy
root wrote: Entrant: Murphy Validity: Invalid Length: 1216 Reason: No matter what I enter, I always seem to get "" back as the result. Could someone double-check this? It passed my unit tests, at least, which were something like 1 1+ 10 1- 10 11* 110 11/

Re: DIS: Not judging CFJ 1828

2008-01-20 Thread Ian Kelly
On Jan 20, 2008 7:52 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another possibility would be for you to judge SLIPPERY (again), on the > grounds you note. If Iammars's judgement subsequently indicates guilt, > then a new criminal case could be called. Of course, an ALREADY TRIED judgement would b

Re: DIS: Not judging CFJ 1828

2008-01-20 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: CFJs 1860 and 1828 deal with the same issue and one should be judged based on the precedent of the other. Since 1860 is the CFJ that's garnered all the discussion, and also an inquiry CFJ (whereas mine is criminal) I intend to wait for Iammars's judgement on 1860 to determine the f

Re: DIS: Not judging CFJ 1828

2008-01-20 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: CFJs 1860 and 1828 deal with the same issue and one should be judged based on the precedent of the other. Since 1860 is the CFJ that's garnered all the discussion, and also an inquiry CFJ (whereas mine is criminal) I intend to wait for Iammars's judgement on 1860 to determine the f

DIS: Not judging CFJ 1828

2008-01-20 Thread comex
CFJs 1860 and 1828 deal with the same issue and one should be judged based on the precedent of the other. Since 1860 is the CFJ that's garnered all the discussion, and also an inquiry CFJ (whereas mine is criminal) I intend to wait for Iammars's judgement on 1860 to determine the facts before judg

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1863a: assign comex, Murphy, root

2008-01-20 Thread Ian Kelly
On Jan 19, 2008 1:04 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: > > > Zefram wrote: > > > >> I hereby assign the judicial panel of comex, Murphy, and root as judge > >> of CFJ 1863a. > > > > I intend to cause the panel to judge REMAND. Arguments: > > comex, root, did this look oka

Re: DIS: Alerting root or Zefram: Consent to judgement in 1849a!

2008-01-20 Thread Ian Kelly
On Jan 20, 2008 5:12 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Goethe and I have agreed to affirm 1849a. We need consent to actually judge, > and you managed to screw up our chances of judging on time. > Please, let us judge. I've already agreed to this, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. -root

Re: DIS: Proto-notification 2

2008-01-20 Thread Charles Reiss
On Monday 21 January 2008 00:08:41 Josiah Worcester wrote: > The Office of Ambassador of Agora Nomic presents its compliments to > the Canadian Embassy in Denver and directs the attention of the latter I think you mean the Consulate General. -woggle

DIS: Alerting root or Zefram: Consent to judgement in 1849a!

2008-01-20 Thread Josiah Worcester
Goethe and I have agreed to affirm 1849a. We need consent to actually judge, and you managed to screw up our chances of judging on time. Please, let us judge.

DIS: Proto-notification 2

2008-01-20 Thread Josiah Worcester
The Office of Ambassador of Agora Nomic presents its compliments to the Canadian Embassy in Denver and directs the attention of the latter to the following: This message is being sent to you in order to inform you of an occurrence in a game of Nomic called Ago

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1831: remanded to Goddess Eris

2008-01-20 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: >just implemented it as "reassigning" to the prior judge. It's not >automatic because that would take more coding, esp. because the prior >judge might have since deregistered or something.) Remanding still works if the prior judge is not a player, because it's not a judge assignm

DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1831: remanded to Goddess Eris

2008-01-20 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: == CFJ 1831 == Initiator: pikhq Judge: Goddess Eris Appeal 1831b: 20 Dec 2007 20:35:09 GMT REMANDED on appeal: 20 Ja