On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> (with a notice similar to mine) to all registered players; relying on players
> subscribing to or reading the archives of a public forum is not sufficient.
I think you mean "non-public forum" here; relying on players subscribing to a
public for
OscarMeyr wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008, at 3:16 PM, ihope wrote:
I register.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
Another visitor! Stay a while
This is just begging to be added to the Mad Scientist role, somehow.
On Jan 30, 2008, at 3:16 PM, ihope wrote:
I register.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
Another visitor! Stay a while
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Jan 31, 2008 5:05 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21:28 Wed 30 Jan , Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > Gratuitous evidence: I often don't have ag-dis delivery turned on, so such
> > messages are frequently not "sent" to me (I do, obviously, read them from
> > the archives). -
On 21:28 Wed 30 Jan , Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Gratuitous evidence: I often don't have ag-dis delivery turned on, so such
> messages are frequently not "sent" to me (I do, obviously, read them from
> the archives). -Goethe
Do you understand and have you carefully weighed the full implication
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 1:43 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 11:32 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 12:35 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I vote for the first candidate on the following list who has the most
votes
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>I may or may not be voting the same as Woggle.
I reckon not. Firstly, the use of "ROOT" to refer to voting the same
way as root has not yet been generalised to other players. Secondly,
"WOGGLE" as a vote value in this election is not categorically invalid.
(It is actually
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
> I wrote the first line intending to be listed as a watcher. Upon reading it,
> however, I realized its ambiguity due to the use of "register". I probably
> could have changed it, but (as I considered that paradox is the soul of any
> good nomic) I, reflecti
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 4:19 Kerim Aydin wrote:
> (As someone admonished in a recent case, why not just ask em?)
I've been deliberately withholding details, in order to maximize ambiguity,
but it occurs to me that the particular circumstances might actually create a
more interesting case. How
On Jan 31, 2008 3:49 AM, Levi Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> == Tailor ==
>
> This notice resolves the Agoran Decision for the holder of the Tailor
> office.
>
> Votes:
> WOGGLE: root, zefram, woggle
> IAMMARS: pikhq, OscarMeyr, Iammars, Eris
>
> The option selected by Agora is Iammars.
>
>
On Jan 31, 2008 1:43 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 11:32 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 31, 2008 12:35 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I vote for the first candidate on the following list who has the most
> > > votes among ca
On Jan 31, 2008 11:32 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 12:35 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I vote for the first candidate on the following list who has the most
> > votes among candidates that BobTHJ's final vote was not for:
> > WOOBLE, ERIS, AFO
On Jan 30, 2008 5:42 PM, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Amend section 9 to read:
> > {{
> > Any party may amend this agreement with the majority consent of the
> > other parties
> > }}
>
> I would prefer to require more than simple majority -- 2/3, perhaps?
>
I'd be fine with that. Howev
13 matches
Mail list logo
