Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1916 assigned to Zefram

2008-03-14 Thread Ed Murphy
Goethe wrote: > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Zefram wrote: >> (More of a concern with clause 14 is that it does not specify any >> *mechanism* for amending the contract, but only gives permission. >> The contract therefore probably can't be amended from within. If it is >> unamendable then my references

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Contract cleanup

2008-03-14 Thread comex
On 3/14/08, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The above notwithstanding, a Contract Change is INVALID if: > >a) It would make a person a party to a contract against their > will. Therefore, any change to the Vote Market (in which I am presently a party against my will)

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Contract cleanup

2008-03-14 Thread Ian Kelly
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:17 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/14/08, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The above notwithstanding, a Contract Change is INVALID if: > > > >a) It would make a person a party to a contract against their > > will. > > Therefo

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Contract cleanup

2008-03-14 Thread Ed Murphy
root wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:17 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 3/14/08, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > The above notwithstanding, a Contract Change is INVALID if: >> > >> >a) It would make a person a party to a contract against their >> >

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement of CFJ 1910

2008-03-14 Thread Ian Kelly
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think the analogy fits. A boat traveling from international > waters was somewhere else before it was in international waters. > Unless it was constructed there, but even in that unusual situation, > the material,