Goethe wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Zefram wrote:
>> (More of a concern with clause 14 is that it does not specify any
>> *mechanism* for amending the contract, but only gives permission.
>> The contract therefore probably can't be amended from within. If it is
>> unamendable then my references
On 3/14/08, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The above notwithstanding, a Contract Change is INVALID if:
>
>a) It would make a person a party to a contract against their
> will.
Therefore, any change to the Vote Market (in which I am presently a
party against my will)
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:17 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/14/08, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The above notwithstanding, a Contract Change is INVALID if:
> >
> >a) It would make a person a party to a contract against their
> > will.
>
> Therefo
root wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:17 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 3/14/08, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The above notwithstanding, a Contract Change is INVALID if:
>> >
>> >a) It would make a person a party to a contract against their
>> >
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think the analogy fits. A boat traveling from international
> waters was somewhere else before it was in international waters.
> Unless it was constructed there, but even in that unusual situation,
> the material,
5 matches
Mail list logo