Re: DIS: Re: BUS: pseudo-Herald's report

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did Eris truly never hold an office for six months at a stretch since we > created the service awards? Unless you count Distributor. -- Eris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can

Re: DIS: it's not a repeat, it's a synthesis

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rather/in addition to currencies... > > I was thinking of re-implementing a "cards" in a way that combined the best > parts of cards, prerogatives, and notes (but not including any of the bugs > in those systems, naturally

DIS: Notary online

I've put the public part of my Notary notes online at , hopefully providing a reasonable reference for the current state of contracts in Agora. (They get out of date from time to time, and occasionally contain mistakes that I notice later - for some reas

DIS: RE: Apology for CFJ 1993

Murphy wrote: > How slow is triple unanimity! > That lofty goal of undisputed truth > That three must reach in no more time than one. > And so the order handed down to me: > Recuse the lot if they be so uncouth > That none persuade the rest before the gun. > But I was lost,

DIS: RE: BUS: RE: Human Point Two... Activated

Murphy wrote: > 5. The Partners shall ensure that Human Point Two obeys the Rules of > Agora to the maximum possible extent. Ah, I missed that. -- ais523 <>

Re: DIS: it's not a repeat, it's a synthesis

Roger Hicks wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rather/in addition to currencies... I was thinking of re-implementing a "cards" in a way that combined the best parts of cards, prerogatives, and notes (but not including any of the bugs in those systems

DIS: Voting questions

Zefram, avpx, why did you vote AGAINST ? (I can guess why Eris voted against, given eir recent voting patterns). -- ais523

Re: DIS: it's not a repeat, it's a synthesis

On 6/20/08, Michael Norrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's "Hear, hear" (punctuate to taste). You're instructing your audience to > pay attention, and hear what's being said. Lots of people do seem to like > writing "here here" though. If you agree, say I!

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Housecleaning

On 6/19/08, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I hereby deregister Jeremy without objection. > > I initiate an auction for the Zombie Jeremy. Starting bid is 1 Stem. So, can someone who was there tell me: were Zombies a Good

Re: DIS: it's not a repeat, it's a synthesis

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote: > (or is it "Here! Here!"?) Where? Where?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Housecleaning

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, comex wrote: > On 6/19/08, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I hereby deregister Jeremy without objection. >> >> I initiate an auction for the Zombie Jeremy. Starting bid is 1 Stem. > > So, can someon

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 1942 apology

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, comex wrote: > Therefore, if I deregister by invoking R101 (as opposed to R869, over > which R101 by far takes precedence), and my right to cease to continue > to play, it seems to me that I would be able to remove myself from the > Ducks & Platypuses contract, thereby termin

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Housecleaning

Goethe wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, comex wrote: >> So, can someone who was there tell me: were Zombies a Good Idea or a Bad >> Idea? > > I always liked them. They did self-destruct rather spectacularly though, > even though we were out of shotguns at the time. -G. What were the circumstanc

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Housecleaning

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: > Goethe wrote: > >> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, comex wrote: > >>> So, can someone who was there tell me: were Zombies a Good Idea or a Bad >>> Idea? >> >> I always liked them. They did self-destruct rather spectacularly though, >> even though we were out of shotg

DIS: Re: Re: BUS: Public forum

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I call for judgement on the statement: {comex deregistered sometime > around or on Thursday, June 19th, 2008 at 8:06:36pm MDT.} > > Evidence: > > If indeed the message comex posted is a public forum, then > http://agora.pas

Re: DIS: Re: Re: BUS: Public forum

2008/6/20 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > FWIW, I did not actually post that message. > I suspect you are lying. ehird

DIS: Re: BUS: Human Point Two... Activated

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Human Point Two once did bear the patent title of Minister Without > Portfolio. At that point it was a person. Now that Human Point Two > has once again gained its Personhood it should regain its patent > title" Is this a call

DIS: Re: BUS: More decontestification

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gratuitous arguments: > > You were marked as party to Brainfuck Golf in the last two Notary > reports. I've looked through history, and found the message archived at >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Human Point Two... Activated

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Human Point Two once did bear the patent title of Minister Without >> Portfolio. At that point it was a person. Now that Human Point Two >> has once

Re: DIS: Re: Re: BUS: Public forum

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > comex posted the message in question. I initiate a criminal CFJ, naming ehird as the defendant, alleging that e violated rule 2149 by posting the above-quoted statement while not believing it to be true. --Wooble

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: MMI-ify forum switchiness

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I submit the following proposal, entitled "Empowering the Registrar", > and set its AI to 3 and II to 0: > > In Rule 478, replace "The Registrar may change" with > "The Registrar CAN change" This isn't necessar

Re: DIS: Re: Re: BUS: Public forum

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Elliott Hird > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> comex posted the message in question. > > I initiate a criminal CFJ, naming ehird as the defendant, alleging > that e violated rule 2149 by post

Re: DIS: Re: Re: BUS: Public forum

2008/6/20 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Evidence: > I just lied in a cfj invocation for lying > awesome > Counter-evidence: I was lying for humorous effect. I said this almost immediately after. This is grossly out of context. ehird

DIS: RE: BUS: More decontestification

root wrote: > ais523 can make Enigma into a contest without waiting. Actually, I'm pretty sure my contestification of Enigma worked, regardless of whether Murphy was contestmaster before, as I was definitely not a contestmaster before it. -- ais523 <>

Re: DIS: RE: BUS: More decontestification

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > root wrote: >> ais523 can make Enigma into a contest without waiting. > Actually, I'm pretty sure my contestification of Enigma worked, > regardless of whether Murphy was contestmaster before, as I was > definitely not a

DIS: Re: BUS: contracts

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I leave Brainfuck Golf, Agoran Twister, and the Fight Arena. > > I join the Note Exchange. This will (probably) be noted in the next report. --Ivan Hope CXXVII

Re: DIS: Re: Re: BUS: Public forum

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, comex wrote: > However, the fact that my forum would be an exceptionally poor choice > for a Nomic (all messages are anonymous and can be set to expire) is > not relevant to whether or not it is a public forum. When did these tests get so trivial? The rules define public

DIS: Re: BUS: pseudo-Herald's report

Kerim Aydin wrote: >LONG SERVICE AWARDS > Three Months: Goddess Eris, Goethe, Sherlock, Michael, Murphy, > OscarMeyr, root > Six Months: Michael, Murphy, OscarMeyr, root, Sherlock, Goethe > Nine Months:Michael, Murphy, OscarMeyr,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: pseudo-Herald's report

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kerim Aydin wrote: >>LONG SERVICE AWARDS >> Three Months: Goddess Eris, Goethe, Sherlock, Michael, Murphy, >> OscarMeyr, root >> Six Months: Michael, Murphy, OscarMeyr,

Re: DIS: Re: Re: BUS: Public forum

comex wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Elliott Hird >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> comex posted the message in question. >> I initiate a criminal CFJ, naming ehird as the defendant, alleging >> that e violate

Re: DIS: Re: Re: BUS: Public forum

ais523 wrote: > Wooble wrote: >> I initiate a criminal CFJ, naming ehird as the defendant, alleging >> that e violated rule 2149 by posting the above-quoted statement while >> not believing it to be true. > ais523 wrote: >> I initiate a criminal CFJ against ehird for violating rule 2149 by >> know

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Werewolves session 1

I wrote: > Voting is now open. I need a vote from all townspersons other than > Wooble (that's root, Zefram, ais523, ehird, comex, Quazie, and Pavitra). Received three votes, still waiting for the other four.