2008/7/6 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Of course, a good way to fix this sort of issue would be to adopt a
rule stating that participants agree to license their messages under,
say, GFDL or CC-BY to cover future postings, then get licenses from as
many current and former participants as
2008/7/6 Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Now if you were to bring a case about eir (implied?) claim to be a
different entity, that would perhaps be a violation of Rule 2149. But
the action itself isn't.
Don't think I ever claimed that on a PF.
tusho
2008/7/6 Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but I'm innocent anyway. See my arguments for that other CFJ about the
same
thing. If performing a failing action is illegal, I'll draft up my
Cantus Cygneus. Nobody
wants to play a
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= Criminal Case 2048 =
ehird violated Rule 2149 by saying that e joins.
As much as I appreciate Goethe's
2008/7/6 ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote FOR that proposal.
Me too.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
Ambiguous, especially since you didn't do it in FLAPJACK.
tusho
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/7/6 ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote FOR that proposal.
Me too.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
Ambiguous, especially since you didn't do it in FLAPJACK.
ehird wrote:
If performing a failing action is illegal, I'll draft up my
Cantus Cygneus. Nobody
wants to play a game that punishes people for just doing things that don't
work.
I transfer 50 pens to myself.
It's only illegal if you know it won't work and still
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's only illegal if you know it won't work and still fail to
disclaimer it.
I'm not sure this is even necessarily true.
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
-- Unknown
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please amend your arguments to cite this precedent?
If I could find it, I would. Unfortunately the only one I can find
offhand is my own, which won't work too well.
Feel free to appeal it if you disagree with the
On Sunday 6 July 2008 10:22:13 Elliott Hird wrote:
2008/7/6 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not that I think putting bits of Agora under the laws of a
jurisdiction other than Agora itself is a great idea. We'd probably
see some case appealed out of the equity courts and into a real world
Please don't kill me.
Whether you lynch me or not, any one false lynching from this point
would immediately cede the game to the werewolves. If we have a
lynching this evening, then it's our last chance to catch a wolf; if
we don't, then tomorrow evening is. Seen this way, the rational thing
to
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This distribution of proposals 5599-5633 initiates the Agoran
Decisions on whether to adopt them. The eligible voters for ordinary
proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic
proposals are the active
On Sunday 6 July 2008 5:07:30 Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I hereby initiate an equity case regarding the PerlNomic Partnership
contract. The parties to the contract are Pavitra, Wooble, abliss,
ais523, chuck, comex, ehird, erez, ihope, jay, norgg, and woggle.
It was not envisioned that the server
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2050
== CFJ 2050 ==
This CFJ was filed by ehird
On Sun, 6 Jul 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2008, Charles Reiss wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= Criminal Case 2048 =
15 matches
Mail list logo
