DIS: Re: BUS: The Winning Team

2008-07-24 Thread Taral
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hereby initiate a criminal CFJ with Sgeo as the defendant, alleging > e violated Rule 1742 by leaving the contract "The Winning Team" when > the contract forbid leaving the contract. It wasn't in force until someone els

DIS: Re: BUS: The Winning Team

2008-07-24 Thread Sgeo
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I stop agreeing to the contract called "The Winning Team" > > I hereby initiate a criminal CFJ with Sgeo as the defendant, alleging > e violated Rule 17

DIS: Re: BUS: The Winning Team

2008-07-24 Thread Charles Reiss
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 21:00, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I stop agreeing to the contract called "The Winning Team" > > I hereby initiate a criminal CFJ with Sgeo as the defendant, alleging > e violated Rule 1742

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The Winning Team

2008-07-24 Thread comex
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No conflict, unless possible winning team==losing team, and the > presence of a conflict would have to be decided by CFJ That's what I get for not reading the whole contract...

DIS: Re: BUS: The Winning Team

2008-07-24 Thread Sgeo
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:20 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:17 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I agree to the following contract: >> >> I agree to the following contract: >> >> { >> Thi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Reformed Bank of Agora report

2008-07-24 Thread Quazie
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:25 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I try one more time, and then give up if i fail >>> >>> Without 3 objections I intend

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Reformed Bank of Agora report

2008-07-24 Thread ihope
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I try one more time, and then give up if i fail >> >> Without 3 objections I intend to chagne the RBOA contract as follows: > > Is "to chagne" a term of ar

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Reformed Bank of Agora report

2008-07-24 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/7/24 Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Is "to chagne" a term of art I'm not aware of? > He copypasted the previous attempt. Besides, you know that we have a rule to protect that kind of stuff. tusho

DIS: Re: BUS: Reformed Bank of Agora report

2008-07-24 Thread Buddha Buck
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I try one more time, and then give up if i fail > > Without 3 objections I intend to chagne the RBOA contract as follows: Is "to chagne" a term of art I'm not aware of?

DIS: Re: BUS: Reformed Bank of Agora report

2008-07-24 Thread Taral
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Without 3 objections I intend to chagne the RBOA contract as follows: I object. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Vote Market proposal: Facebook (ii)

2008-07-24 Thread Ian Kelly
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:39 PM, David Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> just don't clear your cookie file. The cookie will persist until 2038 >> or something. > > Unless, like me, your cookies are automatically forced to be ses