BobTHJ? Woggle? Any thoughts on CFJ 2027a?
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
OscarMeyr wrote:
> Is the Java Chrononaughts still up? May I join?
http://zenith.homelinux.net/chrononauts/
No provision for network play, alas.
On Jul 28, 2008, at 1:18 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
I've configured Zenith to run nightly database dumps. The CotC DB
is ~3MB, the others are both under 50K. (Don't worry about DoSing
it; it's been serving ~2GB per month for a while now, due to hosting
a Java version of Chrononauts after the author'
> NUM FL AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> 5658 D1 2Murphy Generalize panels
FOR
> 5659 D1 3Murphy Let recordkeepers disambiguate
ENDORSE ais523
> 5660 O1 1comex Even objecting and voting should be unam...
ENDORSEx4 ais523
> 5661 D1 2comex Conscientious objec
On Monday 28 July 2008 03:14:11 pm I wrote:
> Resolving this probably will require a close reading of rule 2178.
> There would superficially appear to be a conflict in this case
> between its second-to-last and last paragraphs.
>
> For reference:
>
If the text of a potential contract is publ
ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 14:26 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> What about PerlNomic? Shouldn't that be recognised too? After all, it's
>>> participating in Agora at the moment...
>> Having a forum in PerlNomic in w
tusho wrote:
> 2008/7/28 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> What's that?
>>
>>
>
> eso-std.org's server, so named when we (me and ais523) were bashing
> randomly-typed names off our keyboards over IRC, and we liked that one.
>
> After a quick google, turned out it's a species in both Star Trek *a
On Monday 28 July 2008 03:06:35 pm Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2008/7/28 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Logged or not, your IRC channel isn't a Public Forum.
>
> And you don't have to agree to contracts in a Public Forum.
Resolving this probably will require a close reading of rule 2178.
There
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And you don't have to agree to contracts in a Public Forum.
Rule 2178:
Changes in the text or membership of a public contract do not
become effective until they are published.
The contract in question claimed t
2008/7/28 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Logged or not, your IRC channel isn't a Public Forum.
>
And you don't have to agree to contracts in a Public Forum.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No it wasn't.
>
> I can provide logs.
Logged or not, your IRC channel isn't a Public Forum.
2008/7/28 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Changes to the parties in a public contract take effect when they're
> published; eir leaving the contract was published before you joined
> it.
>
No it wasn't.
I can provide logs.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:50 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Too late; I've already agreed to it on IRC.
Changes to the parties in a public contract take effect when they're
published; eir leaving the contract was published before you joined
it.
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 14:26 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What about PerlNomic? Shouldn't that be recognised too? After all, it's
> > participating in Agora at the moment...
>
> Having a forum in PerlNomic in which e could ann
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about PerlNomic? Shouldn't that be recognised too? After all, it's
> participating in Agora at the moment...
Having a forum in PerlNomic in which e could announce the recognition
would probably be a first good step...
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 22:28 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> http://dotnomic.wikidot.com/
>
> I don't personally have time to keep up with any forum-based nomics,
> but I recommend that H. Ambassador BobTHJ recognize it per Rule 2185.
What about PerlNomic? Shouldn't that be recognised too? After all, it'
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 00:28 -0400, Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Friday 25 July 2008 06:39:35 pm Sgeo wrote:
> > I object. Players joining the Vote Market for the first time are
> > automatically in violation with this.
>
> Yikes.
>
> I object.
Good catch. I won't activate that change now. I still like
2008/7/28 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What's that?
>
>
eso-std.org's server, so named when we (me and ais523) were bashing
randomly-typed names off our keyboards over IRC, and we liked that one.
After a quick google, turned out it's a species in both Star Trek *and* Star
Wars.
Which was all
tusho wrote:
> You can run it on rutian. :P
What's that?
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:02 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, I think Appellant Zefram missed the point in CFJ
> 2086-2087... at the moment that I say "I CFJ on xxx", it is true that
> I am initiating a CFJ on xxx (and not true at any other time).
> However, is it then true that C
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:35 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:12 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Normally I would like to give ihope the benefit of the doubt, because
>> people should not be penalized for stating their opinions about a
>> controversy. But
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:12 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Normally I would like to give ihope the benefit of the doubt, because
> people should not be penalized for stating their opinions about a
> controversy. But it is true that ihope used this statement,
> unqualified, as arguments f
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> == CFJ 2099 ==
>
>I transfer all my crops to the PNP.
I find that that precedents in CFJs 2079-2080 are irrelevant to this
case; in those cases the announcement th
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:11 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an interesting sentence, as I'm not a player and therefore
> have no Notes, and certainly won't have any in the next 72 hours.
Well, then appealing the case so there's a chance the sentence won't
go into effect until you o
2008/7/28 Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It was a deliberately false statement, and that *does* violate the rules.
>
> -zefram
>
You and I *both* know that we disagree strongly on this point.
2008/7/28 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Aha, I only have 2.2 (Zenith is still running RH9, and I still haven't
> gotten around to buying its successor).
>
>
You can run it on rutian. :P
Note that the expression evaluates to the string '\x03', but I guess maybe,
since it's a single character, w
Elliott Hird wrote:
>This is an utterly preposterous judgement, as I was assisting in Goethe's
>demonstration that failing speech acts were not illegal. It was not a threat
>in any shape or form.
I concur that it was not a threat, but also note that threats to kill
do not violate the rules anyway.
2008/7/28 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://dotnomic.wikidot.com/
>
> I don't personally have time to keep up with any forum-based nomics,
> but I recommend that H. Ambassador BobTHJ recognize it per Rule 2185.
>
>From their website:
> I just saw mention of DotNomic in Agora's discussion lis
28 matches
Mail list logo
