I wrote:
> OscarMeyr wrote:
>
>> I declare PRESENCE on Props. 5658-5667.
>
> You already voted on these, so the only valid vote here is on 5661 (on
> which you voted 1 x PRESENT the first time).
Whoops, meant 5662.
OscarMeyr wrote:
> I declare PRESENCE on Props. 5658-5667.
You already voted on these, so the only valid vote here is on 5661 (on
which you voted 1 x PRESENT the first time).
Proto-proto: Team chamber
Assign everyone to one of four teams. Once a month, a new officer
randomly shuffles around a few members.
Define a new chamber in which all player votes are invalid, but each
team automatically votes based on member votes that would be valid
if the chamber were democra
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:57 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WOIITT pledge #21 (unless Ivan Hope CXXVII wants to make my life easy by
> just leaving it).
Or you want to make your own life easy by not tracking it?
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
= Criminal Case 2048
=
ehird violated Rule 2149 by saying that e joins.
==
==
Agoran precedent has established (and ensared me) that a non-player
could violate R2149,
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 08:35, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 10:23 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:06 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Unfortunately for you, a judicial finding has still found that it's
> > > regulated, regardless of
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:37 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Notary monthly report seems like it's going to be persistently too
> big to post to the lists as-is... Just submitting this as proof that
> I've sent the Notary report, anyway.
I've added you to the exception list.
--
Taral
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 09:27, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 12:43 -0600, Charles Reiss wrote:
> > I intend to appeal the judgment of CFJ 2094 with 2 support.
> > I intend to appeal the judgment of CFJ 2095 with 2 support.
> >
> > I recommend REASSIGN due to the corrupti
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 12:43 -0600, Charles Reiss wrote:
> I intend to appeal the judgment of CFJ 2094 with 2 support.
> I intend to appeal the judgment of CFJ 2095 with 2 support.
>
> I recommend REASSIGN due to the corruptive self-interest shown in
> ais523's arguments regarding respect to the re
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 10:23 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:06 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unfortunately for you, a judicial finding has still found that it's
> > regulated, regardless of whether or not the finding is successfully
> > appealed.
>
> I'm not sur
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:06 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately for you, a judicial finding has still found that it's
> regulated, regardless of whether or not the finding is successfully
> appealed.
I'm not sure why you think it matters if objecting is regulated or
not. An Obje
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 22:43 -0400, Matt wrote:
> This message is a repost of my attempted registration in OFF.
>
> I register with the name arkestra. If this fails, I ask if there is an
> active player who would explain why, and how I may correctly register.
This second attempt in BUS fails, beca
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 12:43 -0600, Charles Reiss wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 08:52, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In CFJs 2094 and 2095, I rule UNDETERMINED, as I have severe trouble
> [snip]
> > In my judgement of CFJ 2094, I also find that objecting to a dependent
> > action whilst n
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:04 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to make the following players inactive:
> cctoide, cdm014, Doopy, Schrodinger's Cat
I already posted my intent to make cdm014 inactive; I'll be able to do
so in a few hours.
2008/8/1 Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I register with the name arkestra. If this fails, I ask if there is an
> active player who would explain why, and how I may correctly register.
It fails because you were already registered.
15 matches
Mail list logo
