Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5682-5685

2008-08-28 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not so much, given that it's automated now; just remind me to update the database if your caste changes before the decisions are resolved. The voting limit on a given decision is the voting limit at the start of the voting

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5682-5685

2008-08-28 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/8/28 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The voting limit on a given decision is the voting limit at the start of the voting period. Aren't votes resolved (and invalid ones not counted) at assesment time? Did that change with this new-fangled stuff?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5682-5685

2008-08-28 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/8/28 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The voting limit on a given decision is the voting limit at the start of the voting period. Aren't votes resolved (and invalid ones not counted) at assesment time? Did that

DIS: Re: BUS: Win Announcement

2008-08-28 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/8/28 Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is a Win Announcement. ais523 has satisfied the winning condition of High Score as eir present score is 112. BobTHJ Haha, he was planning that but I bet he wasn't expecting this. :)

DIS: Re: BUS: Win Announcement

2008-08-28 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 11:25 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: This is a Win Announcement. ais523 has satisfied the winning condition of High Score as eir present score is 112. BobTHJ Aargh, I miscounted. At least I underestimated my score rather than overestimating it... Thanks for doing the

DIS: Re: BUS: PNP Voting

2008-08-28 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 11:04 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: This message serves to make votes on behalf of the PerlNomic Partnership (a public contract). The PerlNomic Partnership votes as follows. Each vote is made a number of times equal to the PerlNomic Partnership's EVLOD on each

DIS: Re: BUS: Poobah Caste Shuffle

2008-08-28 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:09 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I only just now properly read this and realised what it actually said, and I like it. I vote for Ivan Hope CXXVII for Grand Poobah, if that voting period is still open. The voting period is still open, but if Ivan Hope CXXVII

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Accountor] Asset Report

2008-08-28 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:13 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Admitted. I thought Flainian Pobble Beads were only exchangeable for other Flainian Pobble Beads, though... Shhh...no one's supposed to notice that once they exchange their assets for FPBs there's no current way to exchange them

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Poobah Caste Shuffle

2008-08-28 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:32 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:09 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I only just now properly read this and realised what it actually said, and I like it. I vote for Ivan Hope CXXVII for Grand Poobah, if that voting period is still open.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Fwd: Werewolf random selections]

2008-08-28 Thread ais523
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 18:56 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: Pavitra wrote: Screw it. I nominate myself. -root I second this nomination, on the theory that werewolves are more likely to pay attention to the game (root was the only other person to actually vote) Voting begins at

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Fwd: Werewolf random selections]

2008-08-28 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:44 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to point out (despite having been killed in the Werewolves game) that this game possibly matters a lot, as the points have just been reset, and so it could give an opportunity to get a good headstart on winning by

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Fwd: Werewolf random selections]

2008-08-28 Thread Ian Kelly
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:44 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 18:56 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: Pavitra wrote: Screw it. I nominate myself. -root I second this nomination, on the theory that werewolves are more likely to pay attention to the game (root was the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Fwd: Werewolf random selections]

2008-08-28 Thread Ian Kelly
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:44 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to point out (despite having been killed in the Werewolves game) that this game possibly matters a lot, as the points have just been reset, and so

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Tailor] Ribbon Report

2008-08-28 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:48 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 15:25 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: ais523 R BKW 4 CoE: I have more ribbons than this, which I CoEd on last time: I also have Cyan and Ultraviolet, at least. Admitted. You

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5674-5681

2008-08-28 Thread ais523
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 08:48 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: I submit the following proposal, Contract Security, AI-2: -- Increase the power of Rule 2198 to 2. Amend Rule 2198 by prepending the following sentence to the first

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Fwd: Werewolf random selections]

2008-08-28 Thread Pavitra
On Thursday 28 August 2008 02:54:29 pm Ian Kelly wrote: If the three of us who are still voting can agree on a non-voter to lynch, perhaps we can get rolling again. Now, *that's* a good idea.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Fwd: Werewolf random selections]

2008-08-28 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:29 -0500, Pavitra wrote: On Thursday 28 August 2008 02:54:29 pm Ian Kelly wrote: If the three of us who are still voting can agree on a non-voter to lynch, perhaps we can get rolling again. Now, *that's* a good idea. I would still be voting, but I'm not allowed to.

DIS: Re: BUS: PNP Voting

2008-08-28 Thread Ed Murphy
The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: The PerlNomic Partnership votes as follows. Each vote is made a number of times equal to the PerlNomic Partnership's EVLOD on each ordinary decision listed below. Each decision is identified by the number of the proposal the decision is about. EVLOD is no

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Win Announcement

2008-08-28 Thread Ed Murphy
Goethe wrote: I seriously recommend exile here. Pikhq activated emself and nearly a month ago offered to make the assignments, and eir failure to do so despite clear acknolwedgement of being informed has blockaded prerogatives due to eir inactivity. Exile is the only way to rotate the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5674-5681

2008-08-28 Thread comex
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/8/25 Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think I remember semi-recently someone attempted to abuse the ratification rules to make emself God-Emperor. I'm not convinced that fix it with ratification properly resolves the issue

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Win Announcement

2008-08-28 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Meanwhile, I CFJ on the following criminal case: Pikhq has violated 2019 by failing to assign prerogatives for August 2008 in a timely fashion before August 1. Criminal CFJs now require 2 support.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Tailor] Ribbon Report

2008-08-28 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/8/28 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:48 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 15:25 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: ais523 R BKW 4 CoE: I have more ribbons than this, which I CoEd on last time: I also have Cyan

DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agriculture Report

2008-08-28 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Aug 28, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Pavitra wrote: I mill 5/8=2 and 5*5=3. I harvest the number of CFJ 2137 for 2 WRV. I transfer all my mills to the PNP. I request subsidy. You might have to wait until next week, per para 16b of the AAA: Once each week, a first-class farmer who at the beginning of

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5674-5681

2008-08-28 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, comex wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/8/25 Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think I remember semi-recently someone attempted to abuse the ratification rules to make emself God-Emperor. I'm not convinced that fix it with

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5674-5681

2008-08-28 Thread comex
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmph. I take issue with calling that a scam. I think that was a legitimate play of twister (give players a choice between a Terrible Proposal and dropping out of Twister to make them drop out of Twister). -Goethe Well,

DIS: hello

2008-08-28 Thread comex
I just sent a copy of what I believe to be the Full and Short Logical Rulesets to agora-official, as well as a message with no subject sent by mistake (the latter because I read a man page for a different version of 'sendmail' that accepted the -n option to not do anything). The rulesets are

DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agriculture Report

2008-08-28 Thread Taral
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I harvest the number of CFJ 2137 for 2 WRV. This fails. CFJ 2137 was assigned its number ages ago. -- Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you. -- Unknown

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5674-5681

2008-08-28 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, comex wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmph. I take issue with calling that a scam. I think that was a legitimate play of twister (give players a choice between a Terrible Proposal and dropping out of Twister to make them