On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
tusho wrote:
On 09/09/2008, Michael Norrish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
Therefore, no matter which noun you replace, you get in effect the same
result. Michael for Monster!!! :)
Err, woot!
Michael - someone better tell me what my
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gratuitous argument on the second CFJ: See the most recent self-ratified
IADoP's report. (The report of 26 Aug 2008 listed pikhq as Speaker, who
self-evidently is not Michael Norrish.)
The IADoP's report doesn't
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:19 PM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gratuitous argument on the second CFJ: See the most recent self-ratified
IADoP's report. (The report of 26 Aug 2008 listed pikhq as Speaker, who
self-evidently is not Michael Norrish.)
Yes, but shall be and is are quite
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Therefore, no matter which noun you replace, you get in effect the same
result. Michael for Monster!!! :)
Well, with either of the interpretations that makes Michael actually
the Monster (as opposed to eir Speaker), ais523
comex wrote:
Are we in the first game, or the (number of
game wins + 1)th game?
The way Agora has been structured since ?1995, there is no Nth game,
we're in just the game. The phrase the first game, in the context
of R104, has a special meaning, though: it refers to
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:24 PM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think I made any commentary to agora-business (check
agora-discussion archives for my brief old considerings). But
basically, the record in 2107a
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
== Equity Case 2108 ==
Ivan Hope has failed to increase eir VP holdings above 50 within
the
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposal, AI=3, The First Speaker:
Amend Rule 104 to read:
The Speaker for the first game was Michael Norrish.
E shall forever be known as First Speaker Michael.
If I'm not mistaken, rule 104 has
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
== Equity Case 2108 ==
Ivan
Ivan Hope wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
== Equity Case 2108
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, ihope wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposal, AI=3, The First Speaker:
Amend Rule 104 to read:
The Speaker for the first game was Michael Norrish.
E shall forever be known as First Speaker Michael.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, it's kind of a tradition, like going back in time to kill Hitler.
So the moral of the story then is that those who attempt to change
history are doomed to repeat it?
-root
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, it's kind of a tradition, like going back in time to kill Hitler.
So the moral of the story then is that those who attempt to change
history are doomed to repeat it?
I was
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
comex wrote:
Are we in the first game, or the (number of
game wins + 1)th game?
The way Agora has been structured since ?1995, there is no Nth game,
we're in just the game. The phrase the first game, in
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 14:38 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As it stands, Goethe's proposal would interfere with mine. I retract
the above proposal and submit the following revision:
For clarity, I retract the proposal submitted
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:50 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 14:38 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As it stands, Goethe's proposal would interfere with mine. I retract
the above proposal and submit the
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thought: if one is really worried about a stalemate being set up
(e.g. constant vetoing or whatever) one limit might be same person can't
hold same
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:21 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We might also just reduce the power of the veto. As I recall, it
wasn't always so absolute.
I would be surprised if, in the face of a rampantly vetoing Speaker,
the rest of the Agorans couldn't muster the strength to pass an AI=2
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 17:21 -0400, comex wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thought: if one is really worried about a stalemate being set up
(e.g. constant vetoing or whatever)
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thought: if one is really worried about a stalemate being set up
(e.g. constant vetoing or whatever) one limit might be same person can't
hold same prerogative twice in a row.
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
In a timely fashion before the beginning of each month, the
Speaker SHALL assign to each of as many active players who bear
the patent title Champion as possible a different Prerogative
for the upcoming month by announcement.
Um, I
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
In a timely fashion before the beginning of each month, the
Speaker SHALL assign to each of as many active players who bear
the patent title Champion as possible a
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I submit the following proposal titled Ministering the Speaker (AI=2):
root,
I've been meaning for some time to finish my proto that turned prerogatives
back into cards, just not getting
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 16:03 -0400, ihope wrote:
I agree to all contracts I am currently a party to.
I can't figure out what this does, if anything. Would someone care to
help me out?
--
ais523
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um, I don't like this. So many of us hold the title you might as
well just make it award it to Senators. -Goethe
If we just remove the randomization, then the Speaker gets to assign
prerogatives as e pleases, but e still has
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
root,
I've been meaning for some time to finish my proto that turned prerogatives
back into cards, just not getting around to it:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2008-July/012627.html
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
Also, for the record, there are currently 25 active players, 9 of whom
hold the title Champion. If you want to restrict that to first-class
players, then the numbers become 17 and 8.
Question: under this system, once I've got the title, do I have much
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
I would support that. I had forgotten that you were working on it.
Heh. working means I really should go back and look at the comments
people made on that proto one day. Honestly due to RL probably won't
happen this week, maybe next. -goethe
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: under this system, once I've got the title, do I have much
(political) incentive to try and win it again? -G.
Yes. Winning makes you the Speaker, which lets you allot the
prerogatives. Anyone who wants
On Sep 9, 2008, at 12:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Kerim Aydin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, it's kind of a tradition, like going back in time to kill
Hitler.
So the moral of the story then is that those who attempt to
30 matches
Mail list logo
