Murphy wrote:
As CotC, I support. ais523?
I am shocked that you would support the judgement of a CFJ without
any reasoning.
Nevertheless, I support.
--
ais523
winmail.dat
comex wrote:
Reminds me of the card game where, on your turn, you have to place
down one or more cards of a certain number, and say what you're
putting down (two fives)-- except you can lie and put down different
cards than what you say. If someone else calls you out on lying,
you're
On 30 Nov 2008, at 15:04, Alexander Smith wrote:
Either Cheat or I Doubt It, depending on who you play with
or Bullshit
BobTHJ, I'd like the points from the following message, please:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2008-November/016415.html
On 30 Nov 2008, at 16:41, Taral wrote:
AGAINST (scammable)
how?
On 30 Nov 2008, at 16:44, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
ehird wrote:
I vote for myself because I am the Werewolf.
Well, either you're crazy, or you're correct.
I vote for ehird in the Werewolves contest.
ehird, Pavitra, and ais523 are voting for ehird. ehird is
lynched; e was indeed a
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Nov 2008, at 15:04, Alexander Smith wrote:
Either Cheat or I Doubt It, depending on who you play with
or Bullshit
I transfer one prop from ehird to ehird (a minor) for the use of profanity.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Alexander Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
comex wrote:
Reminds me of the card game where, on your turn, you have to place
down one or more cards of a certain number, and say what you're
putting down (two fives)-- except you can lie and put down different
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:24:37 +
Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Nov 2008, at 16:41, Taral wrote:
AGAINST (scammable)
how?
I just told my dog that I purported to ratify a document. (No, not really, but
that illustrates one of the problems.)
--
Elysion
On Sunday 30 November 2008 09:04:40 am Alexander Smith wrote:
At this point, I admitted
what had happened; and the other players there considered it to be
unacceptable to lie about the number of cards played, even though
it was acceptable to lie about their values.
I've always played that you
On Sunday 30 November 2008 01:40:59 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I leave the Werewolves contract.
Me too.
Pavitra
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Alexander Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Another interesting data point: I was playing Cheat with a single deck
of cards with some friends. Someone called two fives, and put down
two
{
Ratify the Notary's latest report. Public contracts not in the
Notary's latest report cease to exist.
}
OR
{
Ratify a report consisting of changes that people remember making to
public contracts. Public contracts that have been forgotten about or
no one cares about cease to exist.}
On Sunday 30 November 2008 02:50:59 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Alexander Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I PRS-invest 5 points.
me too.
You can only invest 2 points per week, I think.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
Ratify the Notary's latest report. Public contracts not in the
Notary's latest report cease to exist.
}
Won't work. The Notary's latest report was, I think, correct at the
time it was published, so ratifying it wouldn't affect
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can only invest 2 points per week, I think.
The recent changes (not Notary-recordkept) say you can invest up to
the amount the contract CAN revoke, and limits its own revoking power
to 5 points. I don't believe it's further
On 30 Nov 2008, at 20:06, Pavitra wrote:
On Sunday 30 November 2008 01:40:59 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I leave the Werewolves contract.
Me too.
Pavitra
nttpf
Sgeo wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 4:02 PM, 0x44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sgeo wrote:
5991 D 1 2.0 Elysion Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It v2
5992 D 0 2.0 Bayes none
5993 D 0 3.0 Bayes none
5994 D 1 3.0 Murphy Loose ID numbers
ehird wrote:
On 30 Nov 2008, at 20:06, Pavitra wrote:
On Sunday 30 November 2008 01:40:59 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I leave the Werewolves contract.
Me too.
Pavitra
nttpf
The contract is permissive about where to send messages, so I'm
treating it as effective.
On Sunday 30 November 2008 03:28:01 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
ehird wrote:
On 30 Nov 2008, at 20:06, Pavitra wrote:
On Sunday 30 November 2008 01:40:59 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I leave the Werewolves contract.
Me too.
Pavitra
nttpf
The contract is permissive about where to send
On Nov 30, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Charles Schaefer wrote:
I register to be a player of Agora Nomic. I've been playing B for a
couple of years now, and have had some interaction with your nomic
in the past, such as:
As B's Ambassador: Attempting to send you a mildly offensive
message on the
On 30 Nov 2008, at 21:37, Charles Schaefer wrote:
I register to be a player of Agora Nomic.
Hullo from this side of the pond.
P.S. Why do so many B players send HTML mail?
Assuming no further changes to castes:
* Promotion to Alpha will be a random decision between ais523 and
Wooble.
* Taral will be promoted to Beta.
* The resulting members of Beta will be the Taral and randomly one of
(Bayes, Murphy, OscarMeyr). All the rest will be demoted to Gamma,
and
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 30, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decisions to choose the
holders of the Notary and Herald offices. The eligible voters are the
active players and the vote
On Sunday 30 November 2008 04:08:56 pm Sgeo wrote:
I decline my nomination to Notary, even though last time I checked,
nominations require active consent, not not declining.
Even if it's not required, I consider it a SHOULD; at the least, it's
courteous to recordkeepors to minimize the
On 30 Nov 2008, at 22:15, Charles Schaefer wrote:
I might as well jump in head first. I also accept my nomination.
You get to do with a many-week backlog, plain incorrect info, and
inconsiderate messages.
Woo!
ehird wrote:
On 30 Nov 2008, at 22:15, Charles Schaefer wrote:
I might as well jump in head first. I also accept my nomination.
You get to do with a many-week backlog, plain incorrect info, and
inconsiderate messages.
Woo!
On the other hand, you can make a good-faith effort and
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coin Holdings
CoE: I tink the website from which this was copy/pasted wasn't up to
date as of the time this was copied, so much of this may have been
wrong. Letting it ratify would be a Bad Thing.
2008/11/30, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You get to do with a many-week backlog, plain incorrect info, and
inconsiderate messages.
I deal with the first two on a regular basis in RL. As for the inconsiderate
messages, if I receive any I'll send an even more inconsiderate reply.
--
On 1 Dec 2008, at 00:24, Charles Schaefer wrote:
As for the inconsiderate messages
As in ill-specified ones that work anyway but you have to figure out
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even if it's not required, I consider it a SHOULD; at the least, it's
courteous to recordkeepors to minimize the implicitness of relevant
information.
For the record, since implicit consent was removed, I've been ignoring
2008/11/30, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 1 Dec 2008, at 00:24, Charles Schaefer wrote:
As for the inconsiderate messages
As in ill-specified ones that work anyway but you have to figure out
Oh, okay. No big deal.
--
Charles Schaefer
On 1 Dec 2008, at 00:49, Charles Schaefer wrote:
Oh, okay. No big deal.
Notary is not as easy as you think.
2008/11/30, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Notary is not as easy as you think.
I don't think it's easy at all. But it happens to be the only office
currently up for election, and it would be nice to start off my playing by
cleaning up a mess. (and playing Werewolves, which is what finally
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 14:33, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
COE: VP 70 WTF NO. Admitted.
BobTHJ??
huh?
(Oh, and by the way, I have been on vacation for the past week, so
sorry for the lack of updates to my online reports. I'm returning home
tomorrow and hope to have everything
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 17:23, Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intent, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal case against BobTHJ
for failing to assign prerogatives for December in a timely fashion
before the beginning of the month, as required by Rule 2019.
I act on behalf of comex to cause
On 01/12/2008, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 17:23, Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intent, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal case against BobTHJ
for failing to assign prerogatives for December in a timely fashion
before the beginning of the month, as
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 19:24, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nonamericans?
They can have a vacation too..tell their bosses I said it was OK.
BobTHJ
This is a test message.
comex wrote:
I intend to deputise for the CotC to rotate the bench.
You can't, because it's not directly required.
I intend to deputise for the CotC to assign a qualified entity to be
the judge of each of these CFJs.
I refuse to preside over anything ruder than CFJ 1290. Either you
retract
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
comex wrote:
I intend to deputise for the CotC to rotate the bench.
You can't, because it's not directly required.
CFJ 1776.
comex wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
comex wrote:
I intend to deputise for the CotC to rotate the bench.
You can't, because it's not directly required.
CFJ 1776.
Ironically, I /just/ came across that CFJ while starting to write up
the next
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CFJ 1776.
Ironically, I /just/ came across that CFJ while starting to write up
the next version of the AWJ. Still, the effective time limit for
rotation is the time limit for assigning a case, so you can't do it
until at
The Notary report appears up to date as of November 8th, and the last three
weeks of a-b looks managable.
--
Charles Schaefer
44 matches
Mail list logo
