On 4 Dec 2008, at 02:09, Ed Murphy wrote:
You may have caused VPs to cease to be an asset (because they no
longer
existed solely due to one document defining them), and I'm not sure
what
that would do to the regulation of VP-related actions (in either
direction). Let a judge sort it out, I
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 15:58 -0800, Taral wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure I have at least one point from Werewolves; I've spent a
> > lot of points since then but I still think I have at least one left.
>
> Well then now you have no
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Wed 3 Dec 13:05:25 Pavitra awarded patent title Champion (U,V)
>>
>> You don't get V for Champion. You do get it for MwP though, so it
>> works out. Is t
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Bayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (My initial random selection: Rules 754, 2135, 2034, 217, 1728)
Boo. All Power 3 rules.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but not from Champion. If I'm reading the rules correctly, e got
> a ribbon for Minister without Portfolio, which e got at the same time
> as Champion.
right, I'll correct the annotation, although the method of receiving
ribbon
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 18:44 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> For each contract listed below, I intend (without objection, and
> assuming I am elected Notary) to terminate it.
>
> /dev/null
I object to this termination (but not to the others).
--
ais523
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Bayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (My initial random selection: Rules 754, 2135, 2034, 217, 1728)
>
> Boo. All Power 3 rules.
Yup, this week's proposals are terrible.
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 07:22 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Wed 3 Dec 13:05:25 Pavitra awarded patent title Champion (U,V)
> >
> > You don't get V for Champion. You do get it for MwP though, so it
> > works out. Is that a bug?
>
ais523 wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 18:44 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> For each contract listed below, I intend (without objection, and
>> assuming I am elected Notary) to terminate it.
>>
>> /dev/null
> I object to this termination (but not to the others).
NttPF, and why?
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:05 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> A mole has mentioned to me that the knives have been sharpened before the
> carcass has even cooled, and no one has objected. Thanks, all! :P I
> object to any/all attempts to make me inactive.
It wasn't meant to be an attack; I was trying
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I object to the termination of Warrigal's Grand Poobah pledge.
>
But then Warrigal has no means of fixing it..
On 4 Dec 2008, at 21:01, Sgeo wrote:
But then Warrigal has no means of fixing it..
Um, amending it?
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 19:31, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:23 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> See CFJs 1366 and 1369 (and a multitude of others around the same
>>> time) for the preceden
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 15:13 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> {
> Per the PRS agreement, I attempt to revoke 5 points from ais523
> }
> Reason: Requested PRS Investment
Can I have the 5 PV I get from that, please? Or do I get them
platonically?
--
ais523
Goethe wrote:
> [1] R478: "send a message to a public forum" is the same as
> "announcing".
> [2] Legally reducible for determining what sort of announcement is
> made, but not for all purposes. For example, as a CFJ statement,
> the semantic distinction between a CFJ on "Right now I
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 16:26 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
> In lieu of publishing reports to the lists (they will be forthcoming,
> but I have some programming to do first) the records at
> http://nomic.bob-space.com/agoralog.aspx are up to date.
>
CoE: I'm not convinced the Win by Points worked and r
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 14:29, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 16:26 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> In lieu of publishing reports to the lists (they will be forthcoming,
>> but I have some programming to do first) the records at
>> http://nomic.bob-space.com/agoralog.aspx
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 16:26 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> In lieu of publishing reports to the lists (they will be forthcoming,
>> but I have some programming to do first) the records at
>> http://nomic.bob-space.com/agoralog.as
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 14:15, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 15:13 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> {
>> Per the PRS agreement, I attempt to revoke 5 points from ais523
>> }
>> Reason: Requested PRS Investment
> Can I have the 5 PV I get from that, please? Or do I g
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 14:33, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a win announcement. I have at least 100 points.
>
> (This is ineffective if Pavitra already won. It is also ineffective
> if Pavitra didn't already win, but one or more other players also have
> at least 100 points. H.
ais523 wrote:
>> 6005 D 1 2.0 Murphy Contract precedence
> AGAINST [doesn't a) mean that a contract can talk about precedence and
> thus prevent the rules taking precedence over it?]
a) pertains to SHALL vs. SHALL NOT; like R1742(2), it says "don't put
yourself in that situation in t
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:52, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Figured some of you might be interested to know about the current political
situation here in Canada, which is giving rise to a good deal of debate
about constitutional law, constitutional convention, and
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 15:03 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
> CROP & WRV HOLDINGS
> Farmer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
> -
> AFO53 35 1 0 3 0 3 40 11 26 1 0
> ais523
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:05 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> A mole has mentioned to me that the knives have been sharpened before the
>> carcass has even cooled, and no one has objected. Thanks, all! :P I
>> object to any/all attempts to make me inactive.
> I
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 15:40, Michael Norrish
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the case for him not being natural born?
>
Obama claims to be born in Hawaii. To verify this claim he has posted
a digital copy of a Certificate of Live Birth on his website, and a
high ranking Hawaii official has con
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Joshua Boehme wrote:
>> There is only one interpretation of rule 2126, 2156, 683
>> and 754 that does not lead to a contradiction, which obeys
>> the letter of all the rules in question...
>
> I support this. Referencing rule 683 is what won me over, BTW.
>
Actually me too, I'
On 4 Dec 2008, at 23:01, Roger Hicks wrote:
BobTHJ
The only thing this post is missing is a reference to "Barry Soetero".
* Does Fookiemyartug still exist?
* Does the P2P Partnership still exist?
* Was Levi removed from the AFO's parties?
On 5 Dec 2008, at 00:18, Ed Murphy wrote:
* Does Fookiemyartug still exist?
As a contract, afaik, yes. partnership, no.
* Does the P2P Partnership still exist?
¯\(°_o)/¯ prolly the same as Fookiemyartug.
* Was Levi removed from the AFO's parties?
Maybe.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 17:18, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Was Levi removed from the AFO's parties?
>
I believe you removed em via proposal about six months ago.
BobTHJ
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Does the P2P Partnership still exist?
Yes. It still has at least three partners.
-root
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I object to the termination of Warrigal's Grand Poobah pledge.
Thank you.
--Warrigal "I Think"
32 matches
Mail list logo
