Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PBA, milling

2008-12-17 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: > On 18 Dec 2008, at 00:18, comex wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Elliott Hird >> wrote: >>> On 17 Dec 2008, at 23:59, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: > > You don't have to /shout/.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6027-6032

2008-12-17 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: >> Wouldn't do much good considering Bayes isn't a member of the PBA and >> therefore can't own coins. > I intend, with ehird's consent, to cause Bayes to join the Vote Market. > I intend, with ehird's consent, to cause Bayes to j

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PBA, milling

2008-12-17 Thread Elliott Hird
On 18 Dec 2008, at 00:18, comex wrote: On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: On 17 Dec 2008, at 23:59, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PBA, milling

2008-12-17 Thread comex
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 17 Dec 2008, at 23:59, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: >> >

DIS: Re: BUS: PBA, milling

2008-12-17 Thread comex
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:59 PM, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: >

DIS: Re: BUS: PBA, milling

2008-12-17 Thread Elliott Hird
On 17 Dec 2008, at 23:59, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6027-6032

2008-12-17 Thread Roger Hicks
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 14:30, comex wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Bayes wrote: >> Bayes votes as follows: >> >>> 6030 O 0 1.0 Murphy Undo the rest of 5956 >> >> SELL(10 coins - FOR*8) (93% sure) >> >>> 6031 O 0 1.0 Murphy Undo the aftermath of 5956 >> >> SEL

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6027-6032

2008-12-17 Thread comex
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Bayes wrote: > Bayes votes as follows: > >> 6030 O 0 1.0 Murphy Undo the rest of 5956 > > SELL(10 coins - FOR*8) (93% sure) > >> 6031 O 0 1.0 Murphy Undo the aftermath of 5956 > > SELL(10 coins - FOR*8) (93% sure) Here's the first batch.

DIS: Re: BUS: PNP Voting

2008-12-17 Thread Ed Murphy
The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: > 6014 FOR This missed the end of the voting period by a few hours.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Lousy Lack of Free Time

2008-12-17 Thread Ed Murphy
Billy Pilgrim wrote: > I vote to lynch avpx. That werewolf That's one. With 13 townspersons, we need 7 votes to lynch someone.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Lousy Lack of Free Time

2008-12-17 Thread Elliott Hird
On 17 Dec 2008, at 16:31, Jamie Dallaire wrote: Oh, and PS: saay avpx were indeed a werewolf, and an inactive one... Would the werewolves ever be capable of killing anyone, given that werewolves must reach consensus on a victim??? Murphy? (this rests on the assumption that avpx couldn't

DIS: Re: BUS: Lousy Lack of Free Time

2008-12-17 Thread Ed Murphy
Elysion wrote: > I still plan to finish this round of Werewolves, though, so don't lynch me. Speaking of which, is anyone going to try lynching anyone else?

DIS: Re: BUS: Lousy Lack of Free Time

2008-12-17 Thread Elliott Hird
On 17 Dec 2008, at 11:45, Joshua Boehme wrote: I still plan to finish this round of Werewolves, though, so don't lynch me. What, even if you're a werewolf? :P