On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:33 PM, The PerlNomic Partnership
wrote:
> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> 6060 D 1 2.0 Wooble rest creation 2.0
AGAINST
> 6061 D 1 2.0 ais523 Limited Point Transfer
FOR
> 6062 O 1 1.0 ais523 Social experiment
AGAINSTx8
--
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> If Wooble's motion of 22 Jan 2009 is approved, then immediately after the
> change in exchange rates but before any other actions involving the RBoA
> happen, I withdraw as much of the RBoA's assets as I can.
Uh, no. This is *not* B Nomic
On 23/01/2009, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>
>> I become a party to the RBoA. (I may have already been a party. The
>> Notary website says I am but it also says BobTHJ is.)
>>
>> I post the following Bank Motion:
>> {{
>> Set the Exchange Rate for
comex wrote:
>> 6062 O 1 1.0 ais523 Social experiment
> FOR
Also ineffective due to Rests.
ehird wrote:
> On 23 Jan 2009, at 00:33, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
>
>> 6060 D 1 2.0 Wooble rest creation 2.0
>> 6061 D 1 2.0 ais523 Limited Point Transfer
>> 6062 O 1 1.0 ais523 Social experiment
>
> In order: FOR, AGAINST, FOR.
The last is invalid
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> I publish the following conditional action:
>
> If Wooble's motion of 22 Jan 2009 is approved, then immediately after the
> change in exchange rates but before any other actions involving the RBoA
> happen, I withdraw as much of the RBoA's
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> If Wooble's motion of 22 Jan 2009 is approved, then immediately after the
> change in exchange rates but before any other actions involving the RBoA
> happen, I withdraw as much of the RBoA's assets as I can.
I'm fairly certain such condi
On Jan 22, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Benjamin Schultz
wrote:
I intend to rule GUILTY on this case, and sentence the defendant
to FINE.
Any comments, especially from H. Notary w1n5t0n?
comment: read R1504 before trying to sentence FINE. :-P
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> I intend to rule GUILTY on this case, and sentence the defendant to FINE.
> Any comments, especially from H. Notary w1n5t0n?
comment: read R1504 before trying to sentence FINE. :-P
On Jan 19, 2009, at 4:33 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2348
= Criminal Case 2348
=
H. Notary w1n5t0n violated R2143 by failing to publish the
Notary's monthly report in December.
On 22 Jan 2009, at 21:30, Taral wrote:
Then do so.
Except it's better to tweak the algorithm, which woggle already
protoed in ##nomic. It's a matter of figuring out what will guard
against it best.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> And the RBoA doesn't meet this definition why? "We can pass a hack motion
> to fix the rates"? You can do that in the PBA too.
Then do so.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On 22 Jan 2009, at 19:41, Taral wrote:
I disapprove this Motion. Find a better disposition of the assets than
an inflationary bank system.
And the RBoA doesn't meet this definition why? "We can pass a hack
motion
to fix the rates"? You can do that in the PBA too.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Taral wrote:
> I disapprove this Motion. Find a better disposition of the assets than
> an inflationary bank system.
Well, yeah, the proposal to fix the PBA should really come before this
part of my evil 2-part plan. This part has the benefit of being the
easy pa
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:02 AM, comex wrote:
> Hmm... since when has Bankership not been restricted to aristocrats?
Since Bank Motions were instituted.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I become a party to the RBoA. (I may have already been a party. The
> Notary website says I am but it also says BobTHJ is.)
Hmm... since when has Bankership not been restricted to aristocrats?
On 22 Jan 2009, at 01:17, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I transfer a prop from ehird to Murphy, to restore Murphy to Pilot
status.
Completely Missing the Point of Props 2: Electric Boogaloo
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 19:57 -0500, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2009, at 9:35 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> > I intend, without objection, to flip the Recognition of The Earth Is
> > Nonetheless An Oblate Spheroid Nomic (http://einos-
> > nomic.blogspot.com/)
> > to Abandoned.
> >
> > I inten
18 matches
Mail list logo
