Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Inactive

2009-02-01 Thread Elliott Hird
On 02/02/2009, comex wrote: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Elliott Hird > wrote: >> >> On 1 Feb 2009, at 23:42, Taral wrote: >> >>> I intend to make Bayes inactive without objection. Mail's' bouncing >>> again. >> >> rutian doesn't presently run a mail server. > > ehird does not appear to be i

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Inactive

2009-02-01 Thread comex
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > > On 1 Feb 2009, at 23:42, Taral wrote: > >> I intend to make Bayes inactive without objection. Mail's' bouncing again. > > rutian doesn't presently run a mail server. ehird does not appear to be interested in Bayes any longer, although e left

DIS: Re: BUS: Inactive

2009-02-01 Thread Elliott Hird
On 1 Feb 2009, at 23:42, Taral wrote: I intend to make Bayes inactive without objection. Mail's' bouncing again. rutian doesn't presently run a mail server.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Scrolls of Agora

2009-02-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Sgeo wrote: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Sgeo wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: Historical annotation: >>> >>> Why no commentary on December's Historical Rule? >> >> Positioning is everything: I

DIS: Re: BUS: registration/return

2009-02-01 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Jan 26, 2009, at 4:54 PM, Chester Mealer wrote: I register with the nickname cmealerjr Welcome (back), cmealerjr! - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Scrolls of Agora

2009-02-01 Thread Sgeo
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Sgeo wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Sgeo wrote: Any Player can make a Silent Player a Zombie by publicly alleging that the Silent Player has a

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Scrolls of Agora

2009-02-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Sgeo wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Sgeo wrote: >>> Any Player can make a Silent Player a Zombie by publicly >>> alleging that the Silent Player has abandoned the game. A >>> Player has abandoned the game

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Scrolls of Agora

2009-02-01 Thread Sgeo
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Sgeo wrote: >> Any Player can make a Silent Player a Zombie by publicly >> alleging that the Silent Player has abandoned the game. A >> Player has abandoned the game if and only if e is Silent. As >>

Re: DIS: RE: Re: BUS: The sort of crazy scam I think up when ill

2009-02-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Alexander Smith wrote: > Warrigal wrote: >> A likely interpretation is that a copy of rule 1742, but not rule 1742 >> itself, is now a contract. More elaborate: You can't agree to things, >> only texts. When you agreed to rule 1742, you agreed to its text, so >> its text became

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The sort of crazy scam I think up when ill

2009-02-01 Thread comex
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Gratuituous: no, you and the AFO collectively made the change - or > would have, if you hadn't thus fallen afoul of Rules 105 and 2140. Gratuitous: CFJ 2170 sets a precedent otherwise.

DIS: Re: BUS: The sort of crazy scam I think up when ill

2009-02-01 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > Rule 2198 is > sufficiently powerful to change rule 1742 (note that as rule 2198 uses > the passive, "Contract Changes CAN be made to it", it is rule 2198 > itself, an instrument, that is making the change, as it does not specify > any other entity that makes the change). (Amending

DIS: RE: Re: BUS: The sort of crazy scam I think up when ill

2009-02-01 Thread Alexander Smith
Warrigal wrote: > A likely interpretation is that a copy of rule 1742, but not rule 1742 > itself, is now a contract. More elaborate: You can't agree to things, > only texts. When you agreed to rule 1742, you agreed to its text, so > its text became a contract as well as a rule. When you amended it