On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Alexander Smith wrote:
> To put it another way: if Agora legitimately voted me a dictatorship, I
> wouldn't abuse it.
If Agora did this, dictator would be a political position, and it would
probably be in keeping with the power you were voted to use it. Example:
for a time,
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:38:44 -0500
>> From: Geoffrey Spear
>> To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
>> Subject: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration
>> Reply-To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
>> Welcome. Is there any nickname you'd
Murphy wrote:
{{{
I pledge to transfer a prop from myself to the eventual judge of these
CFJs for giving em eight cases at once.
}}}
Did this ever happen? (A reminder seems to make more sense than an
equity case for something like this...)
--
ais523
>
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:38:44 -0500
> From: Geoffrey Spear
> To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
> Subject: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration
> Reply-To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > I would like to register to play A
I've been thinking about what I'd like a round of BF Joust to
look like, and I have the following suggestions:
- Leave the instructions much the same; > moves towards the enemy,
< moves away, etc. The only change to the instructions I'd make
would be to add . as a no-op that takes one cycle (a
Warrigal wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > Generally speaking, I don't try to fix a loophole unless I've had a
> > chance to exploit it, unless it's really urgent or game-breaking.
> Proto: Remove sudoers line 27.
That isn't a loophole, though (at least if you're talk
6 matches
Mail list logo
