I'm just checking up on how things are progressing regarding joining
InterNomic over here. Elsewhere it looks like we have 4 nomics ready to join
(If you wait for B Nomic to catch up in around 6 days).
C-walker
c-walker wrote:
I'm just checking up on how things are progressing regarding joining
InterNomic over here. Elsewhere it looks like we have 4 nomics ready to
join (If you wait for B Nomic to catch up in around 6 days).
Who are the other three?
coppro wrote:
Looking at the archives, the only effect of this clause would be to
cause Zefram to win, rather than awaiting his return and posting es own
win announcement. (Is {es} the correct word there? Or would {is} or
eir. Most Agoran-Spivak pronouns are based on conjugations of they;
e is
I researched this Fresh Nomic a little bit and I've found that they have
exactly one member who is literally playing nomic by himself.
Oh. I guess it still counts as a nomic.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
I researched this Fresh Nomic a little bit and I've found that they have
exactly one member who is literally playing nomic by himself.
Oh, and there's also Faucet Nomic.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
Oh. I guess it still counts as a nomic.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
I researched this Fresh Nomic a little bit and
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 15:39 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
I submit the following proposal, titled A Silly Bribe, with adoption
index 1.1:
{Set the power of every player with at least one valid FOR vote and no
valid AGAINST votes on this proposal to 1.05.}
Don't worry, having power doesn't
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
You seriously don't want to see the sort of thing a decent player could
do if they had a positive power. (It wouldn't even need to be as high as
1.)
Okay, what could they do with a positive power?
--Warrigal
Warrigal wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
You seriously don't want to see the sort of thing a decent player could
do if they had a positive power. (It wouldn't even need to be as high as
1.)
Okay, what could they do with a positive power?
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 14:41 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
Warrigal wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
You seriously don't want to see the sort of thing a decent player could
do if they had a positive power. (It wouldn't even need to be as high as
1.)
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 16:39 +, Alex Smith wrote:
I call for judgement on the statement Murphy's recent attempt to cause
Rule 2223 to amend itself to read 'This rule intentionally left blank'
was using the mechanism specified in rule 2223, rather than the
mechanism specified in the rule
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
The following proposal is made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly
duties.
Date of this message: Sun 22 Mar 09
Date of last fulfilment of these duties: Sat 14 Mar 09
Proposal: Speaker Anarchy
(AI=3, Disinterested)
Repeal Rule 104
2009/3/22 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
The following proposal is made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly
duties.
Date of this message: Sun 22 Mar 09
Date of last fulfilment of these duties: Sat 14 Mar 09
Proposal: Speaker Anarchy
So, if I want to make a proposal about us joining IN2, how should I
word it? Is referring to another nomic in the rules a good idea, or
should they be kept general?
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/3/22 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
The following proposal is made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly
duties.
Date of this message: Sun 22 Mar
2009/3/23 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
Doesn't that rule serve no purpose anyway?
How dare you!
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without 3 objections, to flip the contestmaster of the AAA to
Wooble.
Having received only 1 objection, from comex, I flip the contestmaster
of the AAA to Wooble.
I became a party
ais523 wrote:
H. CotC Murphy: you have less than a day left to assign these, and they
aren't listed in your database anywhere. Especially as proposal 6159 is
pending, this is pretty urgent; otherwise, I'll have to try to exploit
the possible dictatorship before its existence is ruled on,
Ed Murphy wrote:
CFJ: Proposal 6122 has taken effect.
Caller's arguments: Per Rule 2034(c) as amended by Proposal 6139, the
resolution of Proposals 6121 through 6139 constituted a self-ratifying
claim that Proposal 6122 has not been prevented from taking effect.
Gratuitous arguments:
The
Charles Reiss wrote:
I purchase a Mill.
- woggle
How?
coppro
Charles Reiss wrote:
Quoth the AAA:
{{
12. Once per week, a Farmer CAN attempt to purchase a new Land by
announcing the type of Land e wishes to purchase. As soon as possible
after such an announcement, if it is permitted for em to do so, the
SoA CAN and SHALL revoke 3 Points from that
21 matches
Mail list logo
