2009/7/8 Warrigal :
> LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H
> LATIN SMALL LETTER O
> LATIN SMALL LETTER W
Please disregard this message. It is a typo.
--Warrigal
LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H
LATIN SMALL LETTER O
LATIN SMALL LETTER W
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I spend E E to give ais523 an E Note.
>
> I spend E E to destroy one of Sgeo's Rests.
>
Thank you.
Wooble wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I object. If it's completely unpaid, who's going to bother doing a
>> good job of it?
>
> Arguably it's paid by not having to pay to make the proposals
> Distributable, so someone who really likes propsing repeals might do
> it
BobTHJ wrote:
> I thought I had disfavored cases related to this issue.
You have disfavored:
* 2558-60 on June 2
* 2586 on June 16
* 2590 on June 17
* 2623 on July 2
(each time appending something like "and all related cases", but
note that this only applies to cases that already exist at
c. wrote:
> I publish OVERRULE/FALSE as the Justiciar's Opinion concurring with
> coppro's arguments. (Murphy, you've been violating a SHOULD by not
> reminding me of this; intentional or an oversight?)
Mostly an oversight; four days is a relatively small window. I'll see
about maintaining a fu
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Players SHALL NOT
send a public message with a markup that makes the text unreadable
when viewed in raw form.
>
> So we shall not post an encoded string, for example, to specifically
> encode an Enigma conte
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> Players SHALL NOT
>>> send a public message with a markup that makes the text unreadable
>>> when viewed in raw form.
So we shall not post an encoded string, for example, to specifically
encode an Enigma contest answer? -G.
ais523 wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 10:37 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Proposal: Encodings (AI=3 II=2)
>> {{{
>> Enact a new power-3 rule entitled "Communications"
>> {{
>> For the purposes of this message, an encoding is any manner of
>> interpreting text, including the base character
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 13:10 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > I object. If it's completely unpaid, who's going to bother doing a
> > good job of it?
>
> Arguably it's paid by not having to pay to make the proposals
> Distributable, so someone who
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 10:37 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: Encodings (AI=3 II=2)
> {{{
> Enact a new power-3 rule entitled "Communications"
> {{
> For the purposes of this message, an encoding is any manner of
> interpreting text, including the base character encoding and any
>
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 08:31 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > A player CAN publish a Notice of Violation (with N support,
>
> I've never liked this bit. Unless the Distributor blocks me, I CAN
> publish whatever I want. Probably the creation
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Sorry, re-reading this thread, maybe I missed something: was this a
> systematic attempt to break out every instance in the Rules in which two
> different actions in a single rule are two different ways of breaking
> the rules? I think the fact that there were only a few in
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I can understand that. In that case, just drop all specific officer-
> lateness tinkering (e.g. the Herald) and you're good to go! I guess
> my whole point is: re-level systematically, or re-level none, but don't
> re-level 2 or 3 picked more-or-less at r
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> True, but the problem now is that the severity of the offense really
>> has nothing to do with the power of the rule, which is the current
>> default. Many tasks are at high AI because a quantity happens to be
>> secured, not because th
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> True, but the problem now is that the severity of the offense really
> has nothing to do with the power of the rule, which is the current
> default. Many tasks are at high AI because a quantity happens to be
> secured, not because the task is inherently more important. In fac
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Hmm... while I like this, it does have the drawback that then all
>> deadlines are equal when they shouldn't be. Really Bad Trumpeting is a
>> far lesser offense than failing to distribute proposals.
>>
> But since all these actions can be deputized anyway
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> If a rule states that a certain person is required to perform an
>> action within a specified time limit, and does not name a Specific
>> crime for failure to comply within the time limit, then failure
>> is the Specific Crime of Delay of Gam
comex wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Enact a new power-3 rule entitled "Communications"
>> Players MAY but SHOULD NOT send public messages with formatting
>> markup (such as HTML) that does not obfuscate the text, except
>> where otherwise specified. A
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Enact a new power-3 rule entitled "Communications"
> Players MAY but SHOULD NOT send public messages with formatting
> markup (such as HTML) that does not obfuscate the text, except
> where otherwise specified. A message (or portion
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:47, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I was thinking of something like the following:
>>
>> If a rule states that a certain person is required to perform an
>> action within a specified time limit, and does not name a Specific
>> crime for failure to com
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I object. If it's completely unpaid, who's going to bother doing a
> good job of it?
Arguably it's paid by not having to pay to make the proposals
Distributable, so someone who really likes propsing repeals might do
it for free.
coppro wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
A player CAN publish a Notice of Violation (with N support,
>>> I've never liked this bit. Unless the Distributor blocks me, I CAN
>>> publish whatever I
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> You don't need this to do that. They're two separate paragraphs and
>>> two separate types of actions, so they're already two different ways of
>>> violating the rule. Point remains: "lateness of an Officer's asa
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> You don't need this to do that. They're two separate paragraphs and
>> two separate types of actions, so they're already two different ways of
>> violating the rule. Point remains: "lateness of an Officer's asap duty"
>> should be a g
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> You don't need this to do that. They're two separate paragraphs and
> two separate types of actions, so they're already two different ways of
> violating the rule. Point remains: "lateness of an Officer's asap duty"
> should be a general rule with a leveled set of consequen
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> As soon as possible after a patent title is awarded or revoked,
>>> the Herald SHALL announce the award or revocation. Failure to do
>>> so is the Crime of Really Awful Trumpetry.
>
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> As soon as possible after a patent title is awarded or revoked,
>> the Herald SHALL announce the award or revocation. Failure to do
>> so is the Crime of Really Awful Trumpetry.
>
>
> If you're going to single out one
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> A player CAN publish a Notice of Violation (with N support,
>> I've never liked this bit. Unless the Distributor blocks me, I CAN
>> publish whatever I want. Probably the
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> A player CAN publish a Notice of Violation (with N support,
>
> I've never liked this bit. Unless the Distributor blocks me, I CAN
> publish whatever I want. Probably the creation of the NoV shou
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> As soon as possible after a patent title is awarded or revoked,
> the Herald SHALL announce the award or revocation. Failure to do
> so is the Crime of Really Awful Trumpetry.
If you're going to single out one officer, or a small set of offi
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I nominate myself, comex, Murphy, Wooble, and ehird for Janitor.
I decline; I can submit a proposal to repeal the Janitor rule every
week without being elected to do so.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> A player CAN publish a Notice of Violation (with N support,
I've never liked this bit. Unless the Distributor blocks me, I CAN
publish whatever I want. Probably the creation of the NoV should be
separated from the publication of the allegati
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Yes, *unless* the office is vacant, in which case the holder of the office
> is null, then there is *not* exactly one vote collector, and the first
> sentence is in contradiction with the second sentence. At which point, you
> drop the latter s
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Huh? It won't change the timing.
If it stops failing quorum, the election can be ended unless something
changed recently.
35 matches
Mail list logo
