On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 21:27, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> This is a win announcement. BobTHJ's voting limit on proposal 6413
>> exceeds the combined voting limits of all other players and e wins by
>> Clout.
>
> This certainly fails, due partly to R, but also due to R2134:
>
>
Roger Hicks wrote:
> This is a win announcement. BobTHJ's voting limit on proposal 6413
> exceeds the combined voting limits of all other players and e wins by
> Clout.
This certainly fails, due partly to R, but also due to R2134:
Upon a win announcement that a specified player's voting
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 16:01 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I still don't understand this scam.
>
> coppro argued that:
> > it is IMPOSSIBLE to send a public message except where allowed
> > by the rules.
> because of the equivalence of "acting on behalf of oneself" and just
> general "acting by sendi
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 13:16, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:51, Benjamin
>> Caplan wrote:
>>> Alternatively, have fake players on the list with names like Threshhold
>>> of Allowed to Vote. Then the size of the list would be N+K, where
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 13:29, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:39, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> For eir performance as Herald, I deal G. the following card:
>>> No Confidence
>>
>> This deal was illegal.
>
> So if the dealer destroys it - also il
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:39, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> For eir performance as Herald, I deal G. the following card:
>> No Confidence
>
> This deal was illegal.
So if the dealer destroys it - also illegal but possible - does that
"fix" it so cases for either i
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> Create a grid.
>> No.
>
> How about a mobius strip?
That's just a grid with painful-to-calculate edge-wrap rules.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:39, Sean Hunt wrote:
> For eir performance as Herald, I deal G. the following card:
> No Confidence
This deal was illegal.
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:54 - G. changes the salary of the Herald office to: Justice
BobTHJ
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Create a grid.
> No.
How about a mobius strip?
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:51, Benjamin
> Caplan wrote:
>> Alternatively, have fake players on the list with names like Threshhold
>> of Allowed to Vote. Then the size of the list would be N+K, where N is
>> the number of players and K is the number of fak
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
>> HOW TO ADJUST CASTE
>> ===
>> Pay a major chord (C E G or transposition) to increase another's caste.
>> Pay a minor chord (A C E or transposition) to decrease another's caste.
>> Pay the first 5 notes o
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> HOW TO ADJUST CASTE
> ===
> Pay a major chord (C E G or transposition) to increase another's caste.
> Pay a minor chord (A C E or transposition) to decrease another's caste.
> Pay the first 5 notes of a major scale (C D E F G) to
Roger Hicks wrote:
> Create a grid.
No.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:51, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
> C-walker wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:27 PM, G. wrote:
>>> 6. �Some punishments can move you down ranks (but rests still
>>> � �exist, otherwise people on bottom of list can break rules
>>> � �with impunity).
>>
>> Why not just allow lo
coppro wrote:
> I guess 3 proposals and 11 CFJs
NttPF
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
> I think that the dealer is culpable (be careful who you trust), and the
> actor is culpable iff the contract granting act-on-behalf makes em so
> ("e SHALL NOT cause the dealer to take ILLEGAL actions").
proto: cards website sends message
C-walker wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:27 PM, G. wrote:
>> 6. �Some punishments can move you down ranks (but rests still
>> � �exist, otherwise people on bottom of list can break rules
>> � �with impunity).
>
> Why not just allow lower places on the list than there are players?
> After a cert
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I guess 12 proposals and 9 CFJs.
>
> I guess 5 proposals and 4 CFJs.
I guess 3 proposals and 11 CFJs
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> FYI, I've modified future card draws made by dealors through the web
>> interface to be pragmatic. However, any draws which have already been
>> earned as of this point will be sent platonically if sent from the web
>> interface (such
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 09:54, C-walker wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 15:29, ais523 wrote:
>>> This is the weekly Notary report; for more details, see
>>> http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/ (may not always be up-to-date, but is
>>> usually up
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 15:29, ais523 wrote:
>> This is the weekly Notary report; for more details, see
>> http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/ (may not always be up-to-date, but is
>> usually up to date to the best of my knowledge at the time of a
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 15:29, ais523 wrote:
> This is the weekly Notary report; for more details, see
> http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/ (may not always be up-to-date, but is
> usually up to date to the best of my knowledge at the time of a Notary
> report).
>
CoE or whatever: The NotaryWiki doesn
22 matches
Mail list logo
