Ed Murphy wrote:
> coppro wrote:
>
>> Patent Title Security Cleanup (AI=1.5, II=0)
>> {{{
>> Amend Rule 649 (Patent Titles) by replacing "Awarding or revoking a
>> Patent Title by Proposal is a secured change." with "Awarding or
>> revoking a Patent Title can only be done by a proposal with power
coppro wrote:
> Patent Title Security Cleanup (AI=1.5, II=0)
> {{{
> Amend Rule 649 (Patent Titles) by replacing "Awarding or revoking a
> Patent Title by Proposal is a secured change." with "Awarding or
> revoking a Patent Title can only be done by a proposal with power 1.5 or
> greater."
>
> [T
G. wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> No, really. The grid in this case would just be for visual
>> representation, and wouldn't really need to be a grid at all (forget
>> any previous poor execution of a grid in other not-to-be-named nomics
>> - B)
>
> Agora has had three grids
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 14:20, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I harvest 2264 for a random land.
>>
>> BobTHJ
>>
>
> As do I.
>
NttPF
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> I harvest 2264 for a random land.
>
> BobTHJ
>
As do I.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 13:48, C-walker wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM, BobTHJ wrote:
>> rough proto to solicit comments:
>>
>> Deck of Business
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> How are the cards supposed to be earned?
>
Business would be a new option for player and officer salaries. In
addition perha
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM, BobTHJ wrote:
> rough proto to solicit comments:
>
> Deck of Business
>
> Thoughts?
How are the cards supposed to be earned?
--
C-walker
rough proto to solicit comments:
Deck of Business
Create a fourth basic deck with the Notary as Dealor focused around
contests and contracts. This deck may include some basic cards (such
as massaging contest Threshold limits, creating Medals in the
possession of contests, etc.). In addition the r
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> And also, if you hold the set of three, don't you instantly win
>> three times?
>
> No, because of how exploits work. If you hold a set of three you must
> play one to activate it's exploit which destroys the played card and
> in turn destroys the other t
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 13:23, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Cleanup Procedure: For each other basic
>> deck one such corresponding Ball card is destroyed.
>
> Oh, er, problem with this one. How is the destroyed card selected?
>
Oops, that should read "one such
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Considering some balls will be destroyed by hand limits, and players
> being unwilling to trade balls, wins should occur around every 3
> months which seems to be good timing for a win condition (contrast win
> by high score and ribbons, this would seem to
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 13:17, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Upon the adoption of this proposal set the Frequency of Government
>> Ball, Change Ball, and Justice Ball to 1.
>
> One win for every 100 cards at the current dealing rate? What's
> the point? One way
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Cleanup Procedure: For each other basic
> deck one such corresponding Ball card is destroyed.
Oh, er, problem with this one. How is the destroyed card selected?
And also, if you hold the set of three, don't you instantly win
three times?
-G.
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Upon the adoption of this proposal set the Frequency of Government
> Ball, Change Ball, and Justice Ball to 1.
One win for every 100 cards at the current dealing rate? What's
the point? One way to make it rarer is to say "when you play this
card, the sc
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> I wasn't familiar with grids in Agora's history as they were all well
> before my time (and here I thought I was moving into old-timer status
> having played for over 2 years now). The archives you linked appear to
> be missing so I can't compare, but I'll
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:22, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> No, really. The grid in this case would just be for visual
>> representation, and wouldn't really need to be a grid at all (forget
>> any previous poor execution of a grid in other not-to-be-named nomic
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> No, really. The grid in this case would just be for visual
> representation, and wouldn't really need to be a grid at all (forget
> any previous poor execution of a grid in other not-to-be-named nomics
> - B)
Agora has had three grids since 2001 (two rule
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 21:24 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 19:04, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> > 6410 D 0 2.0 coppro
> > 6411 D 1 2.0 Yally Terms and Vacancies 2.0
> > 6412 O 1 1.0 allispaul A Standard Standard
> > 6413 O
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 21:27, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> This is a win announcement. BobTHJ's voting limit on proposal 6413
>>> exceeds the combined voting limits of all other players and e wins by
>>> Clout.
>>
>> This certainly fails, du
19 matches
Mail list logo
