On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 00:40, Ed Murphy wrote:
> BobTHJ wrote:
>
>> Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:36 - NOV #3 - coppro accuses coppro of rule/crime
>> R2168 with a severity of 1 because: Anarchist election notice
>> Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:36 - coppro closes NOV #3, 1 rests created in
>> coppro's possession
>> F
BobTHJ wrote:
> Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:36 - NOV #3 - coppro accuses coppro of rule/crime
> R2168 with a severity of 1 because: Anarchist election notice
> Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:36 - coppro closes NOV #3, 1 rests created in
> coppro's possession
> Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:36 - coppro plays Absolv-o-Matic to
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I think all flag candidates were dead/impossible anyway (the recent
> CFJ aside). This is simply an illustration that, due to the second-
> to-last paragraph of R2124, any w/o N objections action combined with
> a time limit is effectively the s
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Pavitra wrote:
>
>> As a supplement/alternative, what would people think of criminalizing
>> large numbers of public messages -- say, 8 or 16 per person per week? It
>> wouldn't platonically cancel any messages, and it should encourage
>> people to lump their actions together. O
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists
AGAINST
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I ca
Pavitra wrote:
> As a supplement/alternative, what would people think of criminalizing
> large numbers of public messages -- say, 8 or 16 per person per week? It
> wouldn't platonically cancel any messages, and it should encourage
> people to lump their actions together. On the other hand, it migh
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Still, how about this compromise: start with Agora-Contracts as a
> discussion forum, encourage contests to amend their charters to allow
> "boring" business to happen there, then make it public later if that
> doesn't work.
This feels like the right solution to me. It combi
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I nomic in many spare cycles in a traveling/many multiple computer job, so
> can't depend on an installed base. Dislike most web clients (hate gmail
> for reason you mentioned) - most dependable I've got is term window and
> Pine (after many ye
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 9:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I have every reason to do so; it's my preferred way to look back at most
>> things. -G.
>
> Why?
I nomic in many spare cycles in a traveling/many multiple computer job, so
can't depend on an installed base. Di
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 5, 2009, at 9:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I have every reason to do so; it's my preferred way to look back at
most
things. -G.
Why?
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> Non-recordkeepors, however, won't.
>>
>> Actually, it will be a positive pain for recordkeepors (searching multiple
>> archives), for whom I have more sympathy.
>
> I don't; there's no reason to be using the
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> That being said, I've wished for over a year that the AAA would just
> find their own darn list. I don't see why we should make things harder
> on the recorkeepors for their convenience.
Alternative: create Agora-Contests; make it a discussion forum for
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Non-recordkeepors, however, won't.
>
> Actually, it will be a positive pain for recordkeepors (searching multiple
> archives), for whom I have more sympathy.
I don't; there's no reason to be using the agoranomic.org archives,
which are handy in
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> AGAINST. Encourage minor contest traffic elsewhere, instead.
>> (All recordkeepors will have to check all PFs anyway, so nothing
>> is gained). -G.
>
> Non-recordkeepors, however, won't.
Actually, it will b
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> AGAINST. Encourage minor contest traffic elsewhere, instead.
> (All recordkeepors will have to check all PFs anyway, so nothing
> is gained). -G.
Non-recordkeepors, however, won't.
--
-c.
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
> subsequently make it Public. The valid options are FOR, AGA
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I support this. I think agora-actions would be an appropriate name for
>> this forum?
>>
> While it sounds like a good idea in theory I think in practice this
> would lead to a lot of NttAF messages (well, I guess actions sent to
> a-b would still be legal
coppro wrote:
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
s/business/actions/
> subsequently make it Public. The valid options are FOR, AGAINST
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to decide the
>> holder of the office of Rulekeepor. For this Decision, the
>> eligible voters are all the active first-class players, eac
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 17:03, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I refuse my nomination. Trying to catch up on a year of annotations
>> seemed like a great idea at first, but it would seriously detract from
>> the already-neglected WaveNomic and Livenomic.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 17:03, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I refuse my nomination. Trying to catch up on a year of annotations
> seemed like a great idea at first, but it would seriously detract from
> the already-neglected WaveNomic and Livenomic.
>
Wavenomic?
AGAINST; we already have 4 public fora.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
> subsequ
FOR. There's no advantage of a digest over a second list that can be
sequestered into its own folder/label, and many disadvantages. I will
just lump the messages into the same label for reading, but I can see
the need for reducing traffic.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 5, 2009, at 6:21 PM,
2009/8/6 Sean Hunt :
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
> subsequently make it Public. The valid options are FOR, AGAINST, and
> PRESE
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 16:12, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 15:45, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Even a partial diversion of traffic would help.
>>>
>> I guess I don't see how. Since it would have to be a PF every one
>> would have to be subs
Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
> subsequently make it Public. The valid options are FOR, AGAINST, and
> PRESENT.
Sean Hunt wrote:
> I will vehemently oppose any motion to make web interfaces
> official in any capacity, unless someone proposes a web interface that
> is neutral to all Agorans and retains the nomicness.
We can of course have _supplemental_ web interfaces to the mailing
lists, like BobTHJ's card
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 16:21, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
> subsequently make it Public. The valid options are
I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
subsequently make it Public. The valid options are FOR, AGAINST, and
PRESENT. The set of eligible voters
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 15:45, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Even a partial diversion of traffic would help.
>
I guess I don't see how. Since it would have to be a PF every one
would have to be subscribed to it anyway, so no real reduction in
message traffic. Just more work for new players (one more list to
su
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 15:38, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>>> I'd like to reopen my not-really-a-proposal to split a-b into two
>>> mailing lists.
>>>
>>> One would be a high-signal list where "contentful" actions like
>>> submitting proposals
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 15:38, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>> I'd like to reopen my not-really-a-proposal to split a-b into two
>> mailing lists.
>>
>> One would be a high-signal list where "contentful" actions like
>> submitting proposals, delivering judgements
Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 17:53, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Actions take place on the lists for a reason. �If actions take place
>> off-list, others have no way of verifying them.
>>
> I agree that actions take place on the lists for a reason, but I think
> those reasons can be mitigated
2009/8/5 Sean Hunt :
> Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> 2009/8/5 Sean Hunt :
>>> Tiger OGCBKWM 7
>> (...)
>>> Ultraviolet Be awarded Champion (win Agora)
>> I award myself an Ultraviolet ribbon for my Win by Highscore a while ago.
>>
> Ineffective (at least from my point o
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> 2009/8/5 Sean Hunt :
>> Tiger OGCBKWM 7
> (...)
>> UltravioletBe awarded Champion (win Agora)
> I award myself an Ultraviolet ribbon for my Win by Highscore a while ago.
>
Ineffective (at least from my point of view), it's been more than a
ehird wrote:
> 2009/8/4 yuri_dragon_17 :
>> comex wrote:
>>
>> 2009/8/4 yuri_dragon_17 :
>>
>>
>> yuri_dragon_17 wrote:
>>
>>
>> ฉันลงทะเบียน
>>
>>
>>
>> Some players suggested that to make things easier I should register
>> unambiguously. So,
>> I register.
>>
>>
>> NttPF
2009/8/5 Elliott Hird :
> I'm not entirely sure this counts as a tttpf for the relevant message...
>
I seemed a reasonable synonym to me. The intent was clear.
BobTHJ
2009/8/4 yuri_dragon_17 :
> comex wrote:
>
> 2009/8/4 yuri_dragon_17 :
>
>
> yuri_dragon_17 wrote:
>
>
> ฉันลงทะเบียน
>
>
>
> Some players suggested that to make things easier I should register
> unambiguously. So,
> I register.
>
>
> NttPF - that is to say, such messages need to be sent to
> agora
38 matches
Mail list logo
