On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
> On 8/18/09 4:31 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2666
>>
>> == CFJ 2666 ==
>>
>> This is to decide.
>>
>> =
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I intend, without Objection, to deregister Ben Daniel, modulus, the
> People's Bank of Agora, and Schrodinger's Cat.
>
I object to the deregistering of Schrodinger's Cat.
--
-- Schrodinger's Cat
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Of course, I wouldn't be surprised if any given current set of Senators
>> voted to give themselves permanent power;
I would. I doubt there are many old players who would want to
suddenly come in an
Taral wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Pavitra wrote:
>> A player CAN play N Distrib-u-Matics to make an II(N-1) Undistributable
>> proposal Distributable. E thereby becomes the proposal's sponsor. When a
>> proposal becomes Undistributable, it ceases to have a sponsor.
>
> Requires too m
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Of course, I wouldn't be surprised if any given current set of Senators
> voted to give themselves permanent power;
Oh, er, and this would likely violate every Senator's R101(vii) right.
Although that particular right is in drastic need of a lengthening/
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Pavitra wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> Problem: Former players retain their senatorship and thus become
>>> voters in an emergency session.
>>
>> Nope, because Senator is redefined as a subset of first-class
>> players... but
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Pavitra wrote:
> A player CAN play N Distrib-u-Matics to make an II(N-1) Undistributable
> proposal Distributable. E thereby becomes the proposal's sponsor. When a
> proposal becomes Undistributable, it ceases to have a sponsor.
Requires too many. How about making
C-walker wrote:
> I would propose a system where there was a smaller cost to distribute
> disinterested proposals, but that isn't really possible with cards.
> There is always without objection Distributability, but this can get
> forgotten or objected to for unfair reasons.
>
> Another proto: the
comex wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Problem: Former players retain their senatorship and thus become
>> voters in an emergency session.
>
> Nope, because Senator is redefined as a subset of first-class
> players... but I think this would actually be a good thing,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Taral wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I retract the quoted proposal, and submit the following, and make it
>> Distributable by announcement:
>
> How?
Stupid free distribution of disinterested proposals.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I retract the quoted proposal, and submit the following, and make it
> Distributable by announcement:
How?
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
11 matches
Mail list logo
