Roger Hicks wrote:
> I don't see the equivalence. (If X then Y) implies (if X then Y else
> (not Y)) which is why it seems broken to me.
I believe you're confusing "if" with "iff".
Do we need to add IF,IMPLIES,SUFFICIENT and IFF,IF AND ONLY IF,NECESSARY
AND SUFFICIENT to MMI?
signature.asc
Des
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Also, it's one more Platonic delayed-effect for the Insulator to track.
Who said it has to be Platonic? "Any player CAN create N rests in the
ninny's possession, provided that the case in question in unappealable
and that no player has already done so for that case." Or even "A
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:43, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> BobTHJ wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:15, Ed Murphy wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
> The "with N support" mechanism for NOVs is very messy. This proposes
> to replace that with a simple "with support". It also rem
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> If the action is to be performed With Notice then there are no
> restrictions are imposed on Agora being Satisfied with the intent.
English please.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 16:52 +0100, ais523 wrote:
> "If X then Y" implies nothing about the truth value of Y if X turns out
> to be true.
That should read:
> "If X then Y" implies nothing about the truth value of Y if X turns
> out to be false.
Obviously, I suck at correcting things.
--
ais523
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 16:52 +0100, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 09:45 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> > I don't see the equivalence. (If X then Y) implies (if X then Y else
> > (not Y)) which is why it seems broken to me.
> Err, no it doesn't.
>
> "If X then Y" implies nothing about the truth
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:43, Ed Murphy wrote:
> BobTHJ wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:15, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> BobTHJ wrote:
>>>
The "with N support" mechanism for NOVs is very messy. This proposes
to replace that with a simple "with support". It also removes the
>>> This would
2009/8/28 Roger Hicks :
> (If X then Y) implies (if X then Y else (not Y))
Jesus
flippin'
Christ
on
a
pogo
stick
Please tell me this was a typo.
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 09:45 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> I don't see the equivalence. (If X then Y) implies (if X then Y else
> (not Y)) which is why it seems broken to me.
Err, no it doesn't.
"If X then Y" implies nothing about the truth value of Y if X turns out
to be true.
--
ais523
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 09:22, comex wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 28, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>>
>> Well, to be honest the whole thing doesn't make sense. comex's
>> arguments only further convinced me that the rule has been broken all
>> along. I retract the above pro
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 28, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
Well, to be honest the whole thing doesn't make sense. comex's
arguments only further convinced me that the rule has been broken all
along. I retract the above proposal (which wasn't distributable anyway
because I forgot II
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 08:47 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:35, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > I submit the following proposal and play Distrib-u-Matic to make it
> > Distributable:
> >
> > FIXME (II=1, AI=3)
>
> Why kill the rest of the otherwise functioning proposal?
>
> I play Com
Sean Hunt wrote:
> That Was Easy (AI=1, II=0)
> {{{
> Each person who cast a valid vote FOR this proposal wins the game.
> }}}
I vote FOR this proposal.
I retract that and vote AGAINST it.
Note that the first vote was valid _at the time I cast it_; i.e., I have
cast a valid vote FOR the proposal.
Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/8/27 Geoffrey Spear :
>> I intend, without objection, to modify section 8 of the PNP agreement
>> by replacing "http://nomic.info/perlnomic"; with
>> "http://www.normish.org/perlnomic";.
>>
>
> I proto-object.
Why?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
14 matches
Mail list logo
