Re: DIS: Re: BUS: An Uncertain Set of Actions

2009-08-30 Thread ais523
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 02:53 -0500, Pavitra wrote: That is, I object to all dependent actions is at the recordkeepors' discretion, because one can only be certain that one has fully unpacked the statement by reading every public message in a certain time frame exhaustively. By contrast, I

DIS: Re: BUS: notice

2009-08-30 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/8/29 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com: I intend to audit the IBA. Sure thing, Ron Paul.

DIS: Re: BUS: Emergency Fix Proposal

2009-08-30 Thread Roger Hicks
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 13:22, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote: I play Committee to make FIXME undistributable. I give notice that I intend to audit BobTHJ.  This proposal would remove the loophole e created that

DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-08-30 Thread Sean Hunt
comex wrote: I publish the following NoV: BobTHJ violated R2143 (Power-1) by failing to complete the Anarchist's weekly duties in the week of August 10-16. I intend, with support, to publish the following NoV: BobTHJ violated R2143 (Power-1) by failing to complete the Anarchist's weekly

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-08-30 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: I publish the following NoV: BobTHJ violated R2143 (Power-1) by failing to complete the Anarchist's weekly duties in the week of August 10-16. I intend, with support, to publish the following NoV: BobTHJ violated

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-08-30 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: Aaron Goldfein wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: I publish the following NoV: BobTHJ violated R2143 (Power-1) by failing to complete the Anarchist's weekly duties in the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-08-30 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: You can't publish NoVs with support. -coppro Yes you can... Where have you been? Dependent actions are broken. The CFJ saying they work han't been overturned yet. In any case, e can still intend and gather support,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-08-30 Thread Sean Hunt
Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: You can't publish NoVs with support. -coppro Yes you can... Where have you been? Dependent actions are broken. The CFJ saying they work han't been overturned yet. In any case, e can still intend

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-08-30 Thread Pavitra
Sean Hunt wrote: Sadly, CFJs have no bearing on reality. Strictly speaking, while this is mostly true, one of R217's possible factors in interpreting rules is past judgements. If the rule was genuinely ambiguous before, the CFJ may be a valid way of disambiguating. signature.asc Description: