DIS: Re: BUS: Notice

2009-10-02 Thread comex
N.B. auditing the IBA doesn't create rests, it just destroys cards. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 2, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 07:07, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: I intend, with Notice, to audit the IBA. I leave the IBA.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Notice

2009-10-02 Thread Roger Hicks
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:41, comex com...@gmail.com wrote: N.B. auditing the IBA doesn't create rests, it just destroys cards. Didn't notice that changed with coppro's revision. BobTHJ

DIS: Re: BUS: IBA Stuff

2009-10-02 Thread Roger Hicks
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:48, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: I deposit 3 * X Crop for 300zm. This fails, you have no X crops to deposit. BobTHJ

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: IBA Stuff

2009-10-02 Thread Charles Walker
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:48, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: I deposit 3 * X Crop for 300zm. This fails, you have no X crops to deposit. comex, I believe your 'Ask Bob' finction is broken: BobTHJ's

DIS: Re: BUS: Champions

2009-10-02 Thread ais523
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 11:44 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: This was supposed to be sent as part of my recent automated action e-mail but there must be a bug: I award the patent title Champion to coppro I award the patent title Champion to ais523 I award the patent title Champion to c. I

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ

2009-10-02 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
2009/10/2 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com: I CFJ on: The Short Logical Ruleset is neither short nor logical. Using the words short and long to refer to two different versions of the same document is pretty commonly accepted, even if they're both long compared to other documents. -- -Tiger

DIS: Re: BUS: Champions

2009-10-02 Thread ais523
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 13:12 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: I come off hold. I go on hold. Interesting timing! Congrats on your wins, by the way. -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Champions

2009-10-02 Thread Aaron Goldfein
Perhaps a winning condition should be having won the game in each currently recognized way. On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:48 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 11:44 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: This was supposed to be sent as part of my recent automated action

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Champions

2009-10-02 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps a winning condition should be having won the game in each currently recognized way. Paradox, you can't satisfy that winning condition without satisfying it first.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Champions

2009-10-02 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps a winning condition should be having won the game in each currently recognized way. Paradox, you can't satisfy that winning